shawn kloker
Well-Known Member
Anybody see the new Dragstar exhaust from UFO?
Big pipes,high flow,4-2-1.I like it.
Big pipes,high flow,4-2-1.I like it.
I personally prefer the 4-2 look.But the 4-1 provides the best scavenging.Bigger headers and collectors mean more flow,which equals more horsepower!I am at the point where I want those extra ponies!
That thing has to sound good!
Those extra large pipes have to flow more!
What's odd is that Dales exhaust got more peak HP and TQ over the Hindle/Walker 4-1 he had. Same test bike and all...:confused2:
I like the head pipes up to the muffler; doing a 4-2-1 without losing significant ground clearance has been a challenge for some other MFGRs.
The muffler can looks ugly to me. I like a real can. If that exhaust had a regular can or Carbon fiber can I'd like it a whole lot more.
It would do a good job of showing off the OTEC swingarm I'm gonna buy when I win the lottery:eusa_dance:
Rusty
Look at some drag bikes.None will have aftermarket 4-2's.
That OTEC is sweet but I would really like to know what it weighs in comparison to the stocker...:hmmm:
I'm with you Rusty. A real can would look better/more substantial. Kerker is hard to beat! Just have to cut the center stand mounts is the problem!:bang head:
It think that's for weight as much as anything.
Its for the best scavenging.Ask a few real racers or race engine builders.I have a good friend that is both.
That OTEC is sweet but I would really like to know what it weighs in comparison to the stocker...:hmmm:
I'm with you Rusty. A real can would look better/more substantial. Kerker is hard to beat! Just have to cut the center stand mounts is the problem!:bang head:
It think that's for weight as much as anything.
My understanding is that the split system 4 into 2 (or 8 into two on a V8) was better for mid range power and the 4 into 1 (or 8 into 1 on a V8) was better for top end power.
I've always had 'four into one on my bikes but on the Max I prefer the sound of the split system.
3-4 horsepower? Maybe if you drag race but for street use, who cares?
I Had a 1970 Trans Am that had a Herb Adams VSE 8-4-2 exhaust system on it. It was generally reffered to as a 180 degree header back then.
What was different about it was that the 2 cylinders that were 360 apart in firing were sent to the same collector.
Shit for installation but crazy top end power. You can look at the picture to get an idea of what they were trying to accomplish.
Imagine trying to install this underneath a car and retain ground clearance.
The difficulty of inistallation made this idea fall by the wayside eventually. I believe that Smokey Yunick ( a god send to the world of small block chevys) may have been the originator of this idea.
Scavenging is pure fact and it works, if done in the same order as the firing order the exhaust pulses help "pull" the exhaust gases out of the next cylinder to fire.
On the UFO and HMF the front/left & rear/right cylinders go together and the front/right & rear/left cylinders go together.
On the marks the front/left & rear/left cylinders go together and the front/right and rear/right cylinders go together. Marks also has a crossover after the collectors.
I don't know enough about the firing order on a Max to say that one is better than the other but Marks exhaust is very different from the HMF and UFO, which are essentially the same in scavenging technique.
They are all varying degrees of gain at certain RPM's and of course also sacrifices made in certain RPM's to make gains at other RPM's.
Mark's are the same way except for the balance pipe that connects at the midpipe.
Mark
#1098
The same way as UFO and HMF?
I've looked at Marks and UFO side by side and the rear down pipes on UFO's criss-cross over to join the front pipe from the opposite side of the engine, the marks rear down pipes join to the front head pipe from the same side of the engine as the rear down pipe.
Granted I've only seen tow different examples of Marks pipe and maybe they've changed?
Enter your email address to join: