Yeah I suspect he was just messing with you. On the whole though, starvmax seems to be a lot more focused on gen 2's, where VMF seems more tilted toward gen 1's.
VMF seems a lot friendlier and more "communal" though.
Maybe not then. I love my gen 1. I know it's not the king of the mountain it once was and there's much faster stuff out there. But it's got soul, that special "x factor" that makes a "good" car or bike a "great" one. The whole is a bit more than the sum of the parts.
If I had that kind of dough to dump on a bike, I'd walk right past the Yammie dealer and straight into the BMW one and get me a S1000RR. Even with all the fancy traction and stability control stuff, it still costs several thousand less than a gen 2. It puts more power to the wheel and weighs 200+ pounds less. As such, it would walk all over a gen 2 both in a straight line and in the corners. Plus, I think the S1000 looks fantastic, and the gen 2 looks too "transformers" for my taste.
People bought the original Vmax because it was top of the heap, and that legacy goes a long way. Problem is, the gen 2 just....isn't.
I'd agree.....a significant update to the gen 1 would probably have fared better, even if wasn't as fast. Give it some factory radials, updated suspension, give the motor FI and a few more ponies, ect. Sell it for $10k and Yamaha wouldn't be able to keep them on showroom floors.