This happens just about every time a new sports stadium is built or expanded. Nothing new really. People who can't afford to move and are given a pittance for their home and sent on their way. City's love to do this and have the lawyers to get it done. How has Wrigley Field stayed alive ? Someday, someday.
Not really. Not if you read the article.
No ones being asked to move, the homeowner gets a cheaper loan, the bank and the tax payer gets screwed.
I've never heard of eminent domain being used to destroy a legal contract that both parties were ok with, especially when the required "public good" that will arise from
It is like it is here.
In this case its a third party stepping in, not at the request or permission of either of the two named parties on a private legal contract; those two parties both being in a current state of "OK'ness", taking that contract in hand and shredding it, and rewriting it to their whims.
I don't see this as any different than if I financed you a car for $10k, 5 years later its worth 5k and looking sort of ugly cause you bought more car than you can afford and don't have the cash flow to maintain it properly.
The city says we can't have these ugly cars around so they walk into my business and hold me at gun point telling me I WILL sell them the loan for less than what's owed on it.
Then turn around and refinance you for $5k in the hopes that you'll use the new "cushion" in your budget to maintain the car better, eliminating the blight.
I wonder what all these "bank haters" would feel if banks just stopped retail banking all together....