Stites
Well-Known Member
Hi yall, I tend to think very deeply into things - and I used to drink a lot, too - so this might be odd or just pointless ramble to some of yall.
That said, I get the idea of how the V-Boost setup works. In essence feeding one cylinder with two carbs. In theory it's an awesome setup, not too unlike a 4bbl carb on a street car. In practice, while it obviously works I see more potential with four bigger independent carbs. Bigger, as in big enough to slightly overcompensate for the loss of the V-Boost, under the idea that smoother airflow would mean more airflow in this case. More air=more fuel needed, hence big enough to slightly overcompensate.
I think that way because of those sharp corners that the "secondary" carb is routed through to the intake - it seems like it'd have a tendency for raw gas to wanna pool up in the corners(especially at part-throttle), and it'd all but have to have a certain rpm range where you'd just have an intake charge harmonic that'd make what's in the V-Boost piping just kinda sit in there and oscillate, not really offering much for power. Whereas, four bigger carbs with seamless piping to the intake ports would offer smoother airflow, a little better power output, better gas mileage, and - dare I say - easier tuning/adjustment and better rideability?
Anyone else think that way? Do I need to take up drinking again? For what it's worth I had the notion to design a dual-plane 4bbl intake to try on a V4 until it hit me that V8s with 4bbl carbs have equally-spaced intake pulses and V4s don't, which would starve two of the cylinders in a single-carb setup.
Yeah. Deep thought.:ummm:
That said, I get the idea of how the V-Boost setup works. In essence feeding one cylinder with two carbs. In theory it's an awesome setup, not too unlike a 4bbl carb on a street car. In practice, while it obviously works I see more potential with four bigger independent carbs. Bigger, as in big enough to slightly overcompensate for the loss of the V-Boost, under the idea that smoother airflow would mean more airflow in this case. More air=more fuel needed, hence big enough to slightly overcompensate.
I think that way because of those sharp corners that the "secondary" carb is routed through to the intake - it seems like it'd have a tendency for raw gas to wanna pool up in the corners(especially at part-throttle), and it'd all but have to have a certain rpm range where you'd just have an intake charge harmonic that'd make what's in the V-Boost piping just kinda sit in there and oscillate, not really offering much for power. Whereas, four bigger carbs with seamless piping to the intake ports would offer smoother airflow, a little better power output, better gas mileage, and - dare I say - easier tuning/adjustment and better rideability?
Anyone else think that way? Do I need to take up drinking again? For what it's worth I had the notion to design a dual-plane 4bbl intake to try on a V4 until it hit me that V8s with 4bbl carbs have equally-spaced intake pulses and V4s don't, which would starve two of the cylinders in a single-carb setup.
Yeah. Deep thought.:ummm: