Presidential Election Fraud is Everywhere, Be Very Careful

MR_NST said:

im canadian, and from an outsiders point of view... its not looking good either way, but i am watching the debate. i gotta admit Obama is definately sounding like hes got a better, organized answer/ agenda than Romney.

His responses are out classing Romney... i did watch the debate last weekend as well and i think the entire issue is money. period. The USA NEEDS to rebuild from within, get everyone working at home, buy at home. Quit buying overseas cause its cheaper. support at home. help pay that dirty debt down.

ive also noticed they use the words security threat, war, terrorism. You guys are your own worst enemy. that discussion is enciting fear at home. i dont get it. using fear to control the masses is about as close to brainwashing as it gets.

my uneducated opinion... Obama is the best bet by the looks of these debates, but only slightly. I believe the economy struggles are slightly due to him, but MOSTLY brought on by the Bush years and their policies, HE WAS AN UTTER FAILURE. the snowball was already rolling down the mountain when Obama got there. its affected the world. what can you say?

im an outsider looking in. my economy is tied to yours loosely. im watching cause im concerned how this is going to affect us.

i encourage open dialogue and hope to get a little education out of this thread.

ive said it before, ive got some lawnchairs pointed south with some stiff whiskey ready to watch the impending circus. feel free to join me guys...

peace,
evan...

Click to expand...

rollie said:

i'm not voting for any american president that would bow to the sheik or ruler of any other country or nation , ever ! Most especially a muslim nation who wants us to be subservient to their religion.

Bo has attempted to take the u.s. Of a. Down the his path of socialism , marxism and communism since the day he took office. 98 % of everything he has done stinks to high heaven of his anti-american background of teachers and mentors . Don't think for a second that , if elected , four more years of his class warfare , european type of economy , government controlled single payer mandatory healthcare , non-elected or held responsible czars with presidential cover through executive privledge , huge military cutbacks , won't reduce our ability to be free citizens with the opportunity to succeed on our own .

Click to expand...

captainkyle said:

+ 1

Click to expand...

Rollie said:

I'm not voting for any American president that would bow to the Sheik or ruler of any other country or nation , ever ! Most especially a Muslim nation who wants us to be subservient to their religion.

Bo has attempted to take the U.S. of A. down the his path of socialism , marxism and communism since the day he took office. 98 % of everything he has done stinks to high heaven of his anti-American background of teachers, muslims and mentors . Don't think for a second that , if elected , four more years of his class warfare , European type of economy , government controlled single payer mandatory healthcare , non-elected or held responsible czars with presidential cover through executive privledge , huge military cutbacks , won't reduce our ability to be free citizens with the opportunity to succeed on our own .

Click to expand...

Klatuu said:

I'm almost 100% Libertarian, which means I have an almost 100% chance of never having a viable Presidential candidate I can really get behind. Having said that, I am beyond disappointment that anyone, other than a few ideologues that are statistically guaranteed in any sample group at either end of the conventional left/right spectrum, that would vote for Obama given his record of performance.

It looks as if there is a preference cascade in progress away from Obama at this point. It's not fully verifiable, as polls do not, and cannot, reflect real-time data. Looking at polls is like trying determine the exact location of an animal you are tracking by looking at it's footprints. The animal could have sped up, turned around, or stopped, so all you can really tell is where it's been. Still, it looks like Obama is going to lose, but not by enough to indicate there are enough rational people left in this country to know that someone who has done a piss-poor job should not be allowed to continue in their employ.

Romney has a decent record at turning bad situations around, but you never really know about the challenger for an office he's never held. All we know for sure is that Obama has well-and-truly ****** the dog to the point it might have to be put down.

The thought that I find so sobering is what the closeness of the race portends about the electorate in the US. That there are enough citizens of this country who support Obama despite his abysmal record to make the race so close at this point bodes such future ill for my country as to completely overshadow any negative effect of any one who has or ever will occupy the White House. Whatever happens on Nov. 6th, Obama will be gone either on Jan 20, 2013, or four years after that. The country will survive him, even if it's worse for the wear. However, this country will have little future indeed with an electorate that put him there twice.

"A State which dwarfs its men, in order that they may be more docile instruments in its hands even for beneficial purposes ? will find that with small men no great thing can really be accomplished." ? John Stuart Mill

Click to expand...

mr.maxx said:

i allways hear folks say.." i dont wanna pay taxes so poor folks can have food stamps and welfare." would you rather see starving people and children die on the streets? i dont think so.

You say this with the conviction of someone that believes it is an either or relationship; socialism/welfare or starving children in the streets.

Since the "war on poverty" began until now, the rate has remained relatively unchanged. In otherwords welfare programs have simple taken wealth from the taxpayers without changing the situation. There are other areas where the case can be made that welfare has actually increased the misery.
Our ghettos are full of people that have effectively shunned work and personal initiative to embrace sucking money out of the wallets of those that do work. They WANT to live this way. In reality the real tough guy gets up and goes to work every day.

Click to expand...

85 MAX-fan said:

mr.maxx said:

i allways hear folks say.." i dont wanna pay taxes so poor folks can have food stamps and welfare." would you rather see starving people and children die on the streets? i dont think so.

You say this with the conviction of someone that believes it is an either or relationship; socialism/welfare or starving children in the streets.

Since the "war on poverty" began until now, the rate has remained relatively unchanged. In otherwords welfare programs have simple taken wealth from the taxpayers without changing the situation. There are other areas where the case can be made that welfare has actually increased the misery.
Our ghettos are full of people that have effectively shunned work and personal initiative to embrace sucking money out of the wallets of those that do work. They WANT to live this way. In reality the real tough guy gets up and goes to work every day.

Click to expand...

Exactly, it's far too easy to game the system, and proof that the system as-is does little to nothing to alleviate poverty.

Welfare ideally is supposed to help people who fall on hard times....laid off from a job, injured and can't work, a sudden expense, death, ect. It's to provide assistance until they can get back on their feet, not become a lifelong ticket to laziness.

This summer I was a conveneince store in line, there's this huge lardass lady in front of me with an armload of chips, candy, frozen meals, and sucking on one of those half-gallon fountain drinks. Goes up to the register and don't you know it, whips out that EBT card to pay for it all. Then if that wasn't enough, she has to get 2 packs of cigarettes, paid for with her own cash since EBT won't. Sure, I can pay for her junk food to get even fatter, while the money she actually has gets put toward cigarettes to give her cancer, that I will later pay the healthcare for. I wanted to knock her right the **** out.

Again, if I was president....
Welfare applications are actually reviewed based on need. You must provide proof you had steady income within the last year to be considered, and provide reasons why that income is no longer sufficient or was lost entirely.

Random drug testing is mandatory for anyone receiving government aid. You have to pass one to make money for yourself, but don't have to in order to receive a handout? Should you fail, aid is revoked for at least one month, until you test clean.

You are expected to continue working if you have a job and find one if you don't. If you do not get one on your own in 6 months, the government will find one for you. People like to whine there's no jobs, can't find work. BS. Maybe it's not work you're used to, or a job you want, but look on craigslist.....there's pages and pages of jobs out there. McDonalds is always hiring. People are just waiting for some cushy, high paying job to fall into their lap, then complain when that doesn't happen. If you don't accept or go to the job the government gives you, aid is revoked.

Baisically, welfare should be a crutch, not a wheelchair. You still need to put in effort to better yourself. If you don't, you lose it. Too bad, so sad. I find it very difficult to feel sorry for people who take and take and take, obviously gaming the system to leech off people who work since they just can't be bothered to.

Same thing for medicare. Tired of paying for all the lardasses and smokers out there. People that are sick by their own hand. Well, Judy Fatass needs assistance to buy a power wheelchair since she's too fat to walk more than a few yards, she can't afford her diabetes supplies, and needs food stamps to go buy more junk food and TV dinners.

The government will assign Judy assistance, on the condition she works with an assigned dietician/trainer to lose weight and improve her health. If the trainer reports she's cheating, not following the program, or otherwise leeching, the aid is yanked out like a carpet. Too bad. Did it to yourself, aid was offered, you failed to accept it, so you're on your own.

Heaven forbid you expect people who are receiving free money, that came from hardworking taxpayers, to actually do anything to improve themselves. A surprising amount of "poor" people receiving welfare have more money to themselves than you'd think....to pay for the luxuries they're used to like cigarettes, drugs, and even stuff like snowmobiles, motorcycles, and payments on high end cars.

I know someone who plays the system like this, I know it's possible. He drives a brand new Silverado that cost nearly $50k, just bought a recent used bike(another $6k), owns two snowmobiles, a trailer, and spends buckets of money modding the truck and bike. He is completely able-bodied, but has diabetes. He has a mediocre job that in no way supports his lifestyle, in fact it just barely covers the payments on truck and bike. He pulls a check in from the government to pay for his diabetes supplies, and something he calls "debt hardship assistance"....all the payments for his toys, and the high-interest credit cards he buys everything on. He thinks it's great, how he gamed the system and actually brags about it to people, which then immediately and correctly label him as an *******. Yet the government sees him as "poor" and eligible for assistance.


As for seeing people die on the streets....this happens every day. There's no reason for this to happen other than that person's sheer lack of motivation to better themselves. I'm all for aid to people who genuinely need it, that fell on hard times. And better aid...not just a check, but education to get a better job, "investments" in that person so they can be better off than before. Not just blindly passing out taxpayer money to druggies and leeches that want a free lunch ticket to coast through life on the backs of others.

Click to expand...

jfeagins said:

+1......providing he produces his long-form birth certificate.:clapping:

Click to expand...

Miles Long said:

jfeagins said:

"RaWarrior for President"

Click to expand...

jfeagins said:

+1......providing he produces his long-form birth certificate.:clapping:

Click to expand...

Why? The powers that be recently changed the rules regarding citizenship, so's you no longer have to be an American born to qualify.....or hadn't you heard? :biglaugh:

Click to expand...

RaWarrior said:

Welfare reform.

Click to expand...