• If you have bought, sold or gained information from our Classifieds, please donate to VMAX Forum and give back.

    You can become a Supporting Member which comes with a decal or just click here to donate.

UFO auction

VMAX  Forum

Help Support VMAX Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

CustomMax

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Messages
1,255
Reaction score
7
Location
Pittsburgh Pa
Does anyone have any info on what happened at the UFO auction?
I know Sean Morley bought Jons 8 second record setting VMax (which I'm sure Jon is turning in his grave over that one!) but who better to have it now than his rival and nemesis in business but both had a common love for the same machine we all know and love. And it's definetly one way to finally put to rest the question: how'd he get that bike to go so fast? So, I'm super curious to see what Sean finds and even though Jon let me sit on it at his shop and told me one tip: you gotta make a smaller hole to punch through to get higher speed which actually kinda follows the Martial arts philosophy to pin point the energy to achieve a maximum result. So, I kinda understand how he saw it although I'm not sure the physics work out but hey, I'm open minded. So, let's see what he finds out. The other bikes I'm curious who got were the all chrome Gen 2 and how much they all went for although we may never know. I'd really like to somehow find out what Jons prized bikes came down to be worth. I will say whoever got any of his stuff, I'm sure it was well maintained And know you got something that was built by top notch mechanics either Mike Lees or Jon Cornell and should be A1 for a very long time. Great Job to whoever got them and Congrats again to Sean.
 
I have 7 of them coming my way. I was not too far down the ladder from owning the chrome bike too.

Highlights coming to me are:
2009 Drag Max (Battlestar)
1977 Triumph
1979 CBX
 
I have 7 of them coming my way. I was not too far down the ladder from owning the chrome bike too.

Highlights coming to me are:
2009 Drag Max (Battlestar)
1977 Triumph
1979 CBX

Pics anytime soon ? :clapping::clapping::clapping:
 
Shot some over on Facebook but doing some cleanup work on most of the acquisitions. Not much in the way of new pics.

Sean
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_1.jpg
    Screenshot_1.jpg
    81.1 KB
  • 13B.jpg
    13B.jpg
    80.2 KB
  • Left Side.jpg
    Left Side.jpg
    73.5 KB
  • IMG_20160905_114806449.jpg
    IMG_20160905_114806449.jpg
    66.8 KB
I think I should have posted, "a Silver Jubilee model."

At some point, didn't the Meriden Triumph company make a Weslake 4 valve model? After poking around a bit, the heads may have been a Harry Weslake kit, the rights to which were bought by Nourish. So, it may have been something that dealers would build for you, or you could purchase the parts & 'DIY.'
 
Ah, here's what I was thinking of: http://www.motorcycleclassics.com/classic-british-motorcycles/1983-triumph-tss-zmsz14mjzbea

1983-Triumph%20jpg.jpg


1983 Triumph TSS
Claimed power: 58hp @ 6,200rpm
Top speed: 125mph (est.)
Engine: 744cc air-cooled 4-valve per cylinder OHV parallel twin, 76mm x 82mm bore and stroke, 9.5:1 compression ratio
Weight (dry): 403lb (182.8kg)
Fuel capacity/MPG: 4.8 U.S. gal (18.2ltr)/52.7mpg (period test)
Price then/now: $3,800/$3,000-$9,000


Hope springs eternal, and the 8-valve TSS introduced in 1982 was Triumph’s hope for a brighter future.
Well-designed, comfortable, fast and good-handling, only 112 were imported to the U.S. before Triumph closed its doors in 1983. The reasons for Triumph’s failure are complex and reach back decades, but boil down to the Greek tragedy motif of hubris and unthinking pride. In the glory days of the Fifties and Sixties, Triumph thought its customers would always buy their products, no matter the competition. Triumph was wrong.
In the post-World War II era, Triumph found success in the U.S. with its sporting twins, while its smaller offerings brought in money at home. Up until the early 1960s, the number of American motorcycle enthusiasts was comparatively small and Triumph had no problem filling the needs of its dealers and customers. Quality control was good, and complaints were few, but the good times would not last.
As small, affordable automobiles became available in England, the market for small, economical motorcycles — then the major market in England — dried up. Triumph found itself increasingly reliant on exports and the U.S. market, to the extent that by 1966, 80 percent of Triumph’s motorcycle sales went to the U.S.
At the same time, Honda’s export effort was exploding. Honda had quickly become the largest motorcycle company in the world, mostly by selling small capacity machines to Third World countries. Unlike Triumph, Honda invested its profits in its factories. As a result, Hondas were made on state of the art equipment and featured overhead cams, electric starters, oil-tight engine cases and bright headlights.

Honda’s extensive sales efforts brought thousands of new riders into the sport, and for awhile this was actually good for Triumph and sales continued to skyrocket. Refusing to invest in its factory, Triumph trundled along, making motorcycles on the same machinery it had used since World War II. By the 1960s, the Triumph factory at Meriden was straining at its limits, building 600 to 700 bikes a week. Unable to maintain quality control, warranty costs rose steadily.

To compound these problems, Triumph was being managed by non-motorcycling executives who had no interest in listening to its American distributors, who were clamoring for better product. Triumph didn’t know it then, but the glory years were about to come to a screeching halt.

The first Triumph specifically designed for the U.S. market was the 650 Thunderbird twin, which appeared in September 1949. Essentially a bored out version of the game-changing 500cc Speed Twin launched by Edward Turner in 1937, the Thunderbird eventually morphed into the T120 Bonneville. Introduced in 1959, the Bonneville became the model that defined Triumph for American buyers in the Sixties and early Seventies.

Although Triumph became a subsidiary of BSA in 1951, it had largely operated independently until the early Sixties. While the Triumph arm was making money, BSA, once the largest motorcycle manufacturer in the world, was deeply in the red and dragging Triumph down with it. BSA quit making motorcycles in 1972, and in 1973 an announcement was made that BSA/Triumph would merge with Norton Villiers and the Triumph factory in Meriden, where Bonnevilles were built, was to be closed. The Meriden workforce reacted to the news by staging a sit-in and blockading the premises.

The Norton/Triumph conglomeration struggled along for a year and a half building Norton 850s and Triumph T160 triples before declaring bankruptcy in 1975. Meanwhile, the workers at the Meriden factory formed the Meriden Motorcycle Cooperative, and with the help of friends in the British government were able to restart the manufacture of Bonnevilles at Meriden.

With cubic capacity the measure of the day, the Meriden Cooperative dropped the 649cc T120 in favor of the larger 744cc T140, first introduced in 1973. Visually identical to the 650, it was still an air-cooled 4-stroke vertical twin with two overhead valves per cylinder, but equipped with a 5-speed transmission.

Intent on returning Triumph to profitability, the Co-op steadily worked to improve the T140. A hydraulic disc brake replaced the old drum brake at the rear and the shift and brake levers were swapped right to left to comply with new U.S. DOT regulations, which, starting in 1975, mandated left foot shift and right foot brake. The U.S. market was, as ever, considered crucial to success.

The Co-op was anxious to provide a good product, and the quality control problems that had plagued previous Triumphs largely disappeared. However, there was no getting around the dated design (which was still kickstart only) and high price compared to the Japanese models. A 1976 T140V listed for $1,995, just $150 less than Yamaha’s new, decidedly more upscale and technically competent XS750 twin cam triple. Bonneville sales were not great.
Design refinements for 1978 included improved cylinder head porting for better breathing. Mk2 Amal carbs and electronic ignition came in 1979. And despite the fact the Co-op was hanging on by its teeth, in 1980 it finally managed to develop an electric starter. The bikes were handsome, but an unfavorable British pound-to-dollar exchange rate forced uncompetitive pricing and further reduced sales.

Triumph knew it needed to somehow make its aged twin seem more contemporary, so it turned to the idea of adopting an 8-valve cylinder head that had been designed by Weslake Engineering. Harry Weslake was a cylinder head specialist who started out working with Jaguar before going on to design performance cylinder heads for numerous Grand Prix race cars. In 1969, Weslake designed an 8-valve cylinder head and 686cc aluminum barrel kit for Triumph 650cc twins. The kit was incorporated into Rickman Triumphs, custom bikes built by the Rickman brothers using their own frame and the Bonneville engine. The Weslake head increased output to about 60 horsepower, a significant bump up from a stock Bonneville’s 52 horsepower.
In late 1979, Triumph’s director of engineering Brian Jones started work to develop the Weslake 8-valve head for production, securing tooling from Nourish Racing Engines, which had bought the rights to the design from Weslake in 1976. The new Triumph 8-valve, first shown in 1982, was a significantly redesigned engine, with a stiffer crankshaft, larger diameter bearings, and offset connecting rods to cope with a claimed 58 horsepower. The new crank was supposedly safe to 10,000rpm, compared to 7,500rpm for the standard engine. The cylinder block was new and made of alloy with pressed in steel liners, and the bores were set wider apart for more air between the cylinders.

The new head featured cast-in valve rocker boxes instead of the separate, leak-prone rocker boxes used on the 2-valve heads. Centrally located 12mm spark plugs were flanked by each cylinder’s four valves, set at a narrow included angle of 30 degrees as opposed to the 2-valve head’s 90-degree included angle. Although oil-tightness was a priority, the first batch of cylinder heads suffered from porosity problems and leaked oil badly. Ben Crossley, an engineer at Triumph at the time, claimed in an article published online at Leicester Phoenix MCC that he never experienced that issue. He did, however, blame himself for a known cylinder head leak that can occur between the cylinders, caused by incorrect tolerances he says he specified. According to Crossley, skimming the top of the barrel solves the problem.

The new model, designated TSS, was well-received by testers. It was smooth, didn’t vibrate, didn’t leak oil (the porosity problem with the early batch of heads was fixed), and the brakes were more than respectable. Not only was the TSS well-mannered, but it was reportedly capable of almost 130mph. In its February 1983 issue, Rider magazine gave the TSS an enthusiastic thumbs up, calling the new Triumph “the best ever … fully capable of being compared with the latest from across the other ocean.” Rider further praised the new engine’s smoothness. “The bars don’t tingle, the seat doesn’t shake and the footrests just, well … sit there. If you have ridden an earlier Triumph, you won’t believe it.” The smoothness was reckoned to be a direct result of the stiffened crankshaft and new, lighter pistons. Triumph planned to ship 500 TSSs to the U.S. in 1982/1983, but only managed 112. Unfortunately, the Co-op folded shortly after the TSS started production, victim of a lack of capitalization and economic fluctuations. Triumph shut its doors and liquidated in August 1983. Businessman John Bloor bought the rights to the Triumph name, and restarted Triumph production in 1990 in a new factory in Hinkley, with all-new equipment and an all-new range of 3- and 4-cylinder liquid-cooled bikes.

The closing of Triumph did not deter the many hard core Brit bikers still riding. Many localities had a core group of enthusiasts who appreciated the excellent handling and good looks of Triumphs, Nortons and BSAs. The San Francisco Bay Area was a center of Brit bike fervor before World War II, and continued to champion Triumphs after the Meriden factory closed. One of the most active members of the many local Brit bike clubs is Don Danmeier.

Don has a collection of correctly restored British motorcycles, and one of his favorites is this TSS. “I found it in 1999,” Don says. “A private seller was advertising it and I grabbed it. It was in perfect shape with only a couple miles on it.” Given its low-volume production, some parts for the TSS are hard to find. The mufflers, for example, are special to the TSS and completely unobtainable, so when Don acquired the TSS, he removed the stock mufflers. “I replaced them with peashooters, but the aftermarket mufflers affected the performance. There was a big flat spot between 3,000rpm and 4,000rpm. Two years ago, Ron Kimball did a photo shoot of this bike, and I replaced the original mufflers for the shoot. The performance came back.” The original mufflers have since stayed on the bike.

So far, Don has put 7,500 miles on his TSS. He says he changes the oil, lubes the chain and rides it. “Joe Minton, in his Rider article, talked about rejetting the carburetors, but I tried his suggestions and can’t see that it made any changes,” Don says. The TSS came stock with a Lucas Rita electronic ignition, which cuts down the maintenance, yet Don says “all the Lucas components work.” He thinks that most problems with British electrics result from bad wiring rather than the components themselves.

Don admits to “flogging the bike a little. It handles great, has great brakes and stops on a dime. It’s comfortable and cushy to ride.” he says, adding, “the valves rustle as you ride, but it’s not the typical overhead valve sound. In stop-and-go traffic, it’s much like the pre-unit bike, it pulls from 3,000rpm. When you get out beyond the city limits, it really motors. The TSS cruises at 70mph.

“It’s a great bike,” Don concludes. “I don’t know that it would have saved Triumph — maybe if they had found financing, it would have bridged the gap.” Sadly, Triumph never did get the funding it needed to stay in the game, and the TSS remains as a reminder of the Co-op’s resolve to stay in the fight to the end, whatever the odds. MC


I think I should have posted, "a Silver Jubilee model."

At some point, didn't the Meriden Triumph company make a Weslake 4 valve model? After poking around a bit, the heads may have been a Harry Weslake kit, the rights to which were bought by Nourish. So, it may have been something that dealers would build for you, or you could purchase the parts & 'DIY.'
 
Shot some over on Facebook but doing some cleanup work on most of the acquisitions. Not much in the way of new pics.

Sean
I'm glad to see some of the bikes they had on offer ended up with someone who appreciates them for what they are.
 
There was a Hinkley Triumph Golden Jubilee as a dealer-installed option, a set of tins.
http://www.triumphrat.net/air-cooled-twins-technical-talk/55789-golden-anniversary-edition.html

Sean got a neat group of bikes, something of interest in each. I think I would choose the CBX if I could have one of his new fleet.

One of my local acquaintances bought a left-over 1979/80 CBX and took delivery of it in the crate. He assembled it himself and still has it. He paid $4K for it a couple years after they stopped production in 1982.

The only golden jubilee im familiar with is a Ford tractor built in the 50's.


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 
Silver Jubilee for sure.
The Triumph has 6 miles on it. Still going to get a complete teardown and rebuild to make it super nice again. Probably end up selling it.
The CBX has started it's restoration but again I think we're going all the way down with it. I always wanted one of these and even if I sell it after I get it pristine I can at least have said I owned one!
The Carbon "8 Second" bike is getting a lot more work done to it to get a true 8 second non nitrous pass out of it. Then I'll probably get a bit more crazy with it!
The Venture and Vision are both getting minimum needed to be road worth and resold.
The Chain Drive Vmax will be a parts bike (no title anyway)
The Fazer I bought is rough and already completely torn down and parts thrown in the various bins
 
I once borrowed my friend's 1981 CBX, which was a monoshock sport-tourer, quite a bit different from the twin rear shock 1979-1980 model. He wanted some company on a ride from Miami to Naples FL. My bike had issues at the time, so I borrowed the CBX.

That thing sounded like a Porsche! What a beautiful exhaust note. We went across Tamiami Trail to Naples, and we encountered a bike group from Miami on an organized ride. We rode with them for a bit, and I told my friend, "hey, this isn't for me!" We cut loose and since we had already eaten lunch over there, it was time to head back east to Miami.

Tamiami Trail is a divided two-lane each way tollroad which cuts through the Everglades. You have to keep an eye out for alligators, deer, and snakes, as you may encounter any, some, or all of these residents of the "river of grass" which is really a wild place. The Everglades is a shallow swamp that spans the middle of lower Florida and serves as God's own watershed, filtering water as it flows south from Lake Okeechobee to the north. The water eventually merges into the ocean or the Gulf of Mexico, where the brackish water serves as one of the places on earth where an amazing variety of plants and animals thrive. Alligators, crocodiles, dolphins (the mammals, not the fish, but yes, dolphin fish too), bonefish (a great sport-fishing shallow water resident), crabs, all-kinds of birds, including ospreys, hawks, eagles, roseate spoonbills, with colors you can't believe until you see one, flamingos, and plenty more.

There are raised areas, islands, really, where many of the mammals hang-out, including deer and the elusive Florida panther. These islands are called 'hammocks,' and as you gaze across the water and swampgrass, you can see them dotting the area in the distance. During times of high rainfall, these serve as places of refuge for the mammals.

People get around the Everglades in airboats, and if you think owning a VMax is an expensive hobby, don't even think about buying an airboat! Shallow draft aluminum-hulled flat-bottom boats powered by pusher-propeller engines mounted on raised pylons at the stern of the boat, they're usually less-than 20 ft long, though the Indians who have tribal territories including parts of the Everglades have huge airboats they take tourists on, into the Everglades for day trips.

So, back to the trip home. We got on Tamiami Trail, and soon we saw nearly constant lightning from a storm front to our north. My friend was on his new 6-cyl Gold Wing, and we decided through hand signals that it was going to be chancy about getting back to the east coast of Florida before this storm caught us. So, we upped the pace, and I kept that CBX at 8,000 rpm most of the way east. What a sound! It has been one of those rides I've always remembered. We only got a few sprinkles, never a drenching rainfall, and for about an hour I got to imagine what it must be like to ride on a high-speed bowl with only speed as your constant companion, urging you on as the engine throws you forward faster than most have ever gone.

Yeah, I like a CBX.

Silver Jubilee for sure.
The Triumph has 6 miles on it. Still going to get a complete teardown and rebuild to make it super nice again. Probably end up selling it.
The CBX has started it's restoration but again I think we're going all the way down with it. I always wanted one of these and even if I sell it after I get it pristine I can at least have said I owned one!
The Carbon "8 Second" bike is getting a lot more work done to it to get a true 8 second non nitrous pass out of it. Then I'll probably get a bit more crazy with it!
The Venture and Vision are both getting minimum needed to be road worth and resold.
The Chain Drive Vmax will be a parts bike (no title anyway)
The Fazer I bought is rough and already completely torn down and parts thrown in the various bins
 
Back
Top