Traumahawk
Well-Known Member
Somebody somewhere will fight this fight....and it will be interesting to see how it turns out, and I do find it amusing how the logic that SCOTUS used can be applied to other things as well.
The Supreme Court got it right this time
- Thread starter forestdaledave
- Start date
Help Support VMAX Forum:
Somebody somewhere will fight this fight....and it will be interesting to see how it turns out, and I do find it amusing how the logic that SCOTUS used can be applied to other things as well.
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
The Constitution cannot be selectively applied to this and not that. It applies to EVERY state, EVERY person, and EVERY law in the United States.
Traumahawk
Well-Known Member
Did you read the article I posted in its entirety?
Sent from my SCH-R890 using Tapatalk
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
Yeah... pretty much a drawn out version of what you posted.
MtnMax/Magniac
Well-Known Member
Except when some liberal fringe group decides they've been mistreated because the rest of the world doesn't agree with them.
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
Corrected it for you.
Rollie
Well-Known Member
Tell that to BO . He has directed his former attorney general puppet NOT to enforce certain laws and break some along the way.
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
I am certain a million e-mails have been sent to him about that already, and I would be willing to place good money that everyone who sends such e-mails to him gets put on a watch list lol
Obama bin Laden has got to be one of the most blatant criminals to ever hold office in this nation!
85 MAX-fan
Well-Known Member
No, the sentence you quoted was a question. "Name calling" would not be in question form, it would be a statement, like "Dave is a coolaid drinker!". Sentence structure and punctuation.
Learn it
Know it
Live it
Perhaps it was the impact of reading the horribly offensive words "coolaid drinker" that threw you for a loop. I am sure Dave would agree that this whole freedom of speech concept should be outlawed just as enthusiastically as he has supported assaulting police officers.
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
Reading the post from earlier, just to confirm my thoughts, it feels more of an underhanded way of implying that he is a blind Jim Jones follower that happily plods along to his death at the hands of those he follows.
Direct name calling would not be in question form, but as a writer, I do happen to know how to recognize creative ways to say things to give an appearance of non-aggression.
And you would be the first one pissing and moaning when it is your words that get silenced, I imagine.
Lastly, if I wanted to see anything "offensive", I would go to a Madonna concert.
MtnMax/Magniac
Well-Known Member
You did NOT correct it, you changed it to suit yourself. Not the same thing at all.
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
No need to get butthurt over it
MtnMax/Magniac
Well-Known Member
Not hurt at all, just semantically straightening out a misstatement. :biglaugh:
johnpclynch
Well-Known Member
mvmccreary
Well-Known Member
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA :clapping:
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
MtnMax/Magniac
Well-Known Member
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
MtnMax/Magniac
Well-Known Member
Is that something that you are hoping for?
No, but I thought you might be . . .
Biker Dash
Well-Known Member
So, because I have beliefs that differ from yours, it is assumed that I am someone who criminally seeks little boys and girls?
Please, explain your logic to me. I am quite interested in how you made this leap in judgement.
Similar threads
