If offering an alternative opinion is being rude then so be it - it wasn't intended to be.
My point is centered on the assumption that the cooling system is adequate for the job.
On that basis then as the motor heats up the thermostat will open further to allow more coolant to flow through the radiator.
If the coolant temperature continues to rise then the fan would cut in to reduce it.
IMHO removing the rear shield would have little effect on the overall operating temperature of the motor.
I'm also curious to know why it is only the rear shield that is removed - why not the one at the front as well?
Indeed if your assertion is correct it then removing the shield will allow additional heat to be convected to the fuel lines, pump and carbs - is that really a good idea?
Over the years I have learned that the 'experts' don't always know best and that it is not unreasonable to query views that seem at odds with your own understanding.
I am not immune from the above and I am quite happy to have any points I make challenged.
Contrary to your statement I know I don't know everything.
Of course you may have actual temperature readings to back-up your argument in which case will not hesitate to withdraw my statements.
Until then we are both offering opinions which all and sundry are at liberty to accept or reject.
My point is centered on the assumption that the cooling system is adequate for the job.
On that basis then as the motor heats up the thermostat will open further to allow more coolant to flow through the radiator.
If the coolant temperature continues to rise then the fan would cut in to reduce it.
IMHO removing the rear shield would have little effect on the overall operating temperature of the motor.
I'm also curious to know why it is only the rear shield that is removed - why not the one at the front as well?
Indeed if your assertion is correct it then removing the shield will allow additional heat to be convected to the fuel lines, pump and carbs - is that really a good idea?
Over the years I have learned that the 'experts' don't always know best and that it is not unreasonable to query views that seem at odds with your own understanding.
I am not immune from the above and I am quite happy to have any points I make challenged.
Contrary to your statement I know I don't know everything.
Of course you may have actual temperature readings to back-up your argument in which case will not hesitate to withdraw my statements.
Until then we are both offering opinions which all and sundry are at liberty to accept or reject.