California Gun legislation

[dannymax]

Danny, we all know messing around with drugs can get a person killed. More ways than one. So I don't mess at all. Which brings a question asked of me from another poster. If I really believe what I said about being more relax in Mexico than in S.CA. The above is the difference. In Mexico the violence is focused. Stay away from illegal drug/trade and you stay away from violence. In CA. and the U.S. the violence is random. Anywhere, at any time and being armed doesn't seem to help at all. The other crazy concept that gun laws hasn't helped I have to remind about the law that came about from ST.Valentine Day's massacre. Kind of stopped fully automatic rifles. Breaking news right now.
http://news.yahoo.com/mit-lockdown-reports-armed-gunman-145834790.html
This violence is too much. The person is using a long rifle, not a hammer or a knife or a paper clip. Once again I point to Chris Dornor from L.A. Being armed and trained didn't help the cops that he shot and killed. But in the end he didn't win either. Unless of course putting his own gun to his own head is somehow winning against the Government.

Sure did Dave....stopped 'em cold!! Be really hard to find a full auto in the hands of an evil doer these days....yup! :icon_rolleyes:

Sorry Dave....the person doesn't exist. must be some liberal didn't think there was enough front page sensationalism already and decided to create some.....:confused2:I know it's fun going back 'n forth on this gun thing and all but ya gotta 'deal in the real' man! unk:

I'm missing your point Dave....they cancel each other out, or what? :ummm:

 

[ouchez]

Ouch, abortion is a separate issue from gun violence. You seem to want to keep confusing the two. The issue of guns and violence in society is complicated enough. Start another link about abortion if you want to rant about that. But you can start off with the knowledge that no one including me is in favor of abortion. Not even the women that elect to have it. That is an erroneous question. The same as when we were little kids and would ask our friends coyly if their mother knows their underware was dirty. Then get to laugh whatever the answer was. So start another thread about the abortion question. Maybe even expand to a political thread.

Rosarito Dave,

I think they are very related, while you are not in favor of abortion, which is extreme violence equal to Sandy Hook, I wonder if you would support any action, by legislation, to hinder-stop "a womens right to choose", (murder), abortion. True or false.........................

You understand Dave, those same people crying about the danger of guns and our right to own the gun of our choice, or buy any amount of ammo we desire, those trying to take our Constitutional rights away because of the children killed at Sandy Hook by devil Lanza,, are also rabid "Pro Abortion Rights Advocates", (child murder), making them all Hypocrites. ( Obama being one of the biggest lovers of abortion and a major hypocrite, crying for the children of Sandy Hook,:damn angry:, what craven BS!

O

 

[Rusty McNeil]

I think Dave is just bored to tears living a quite life of desperation in beautiful Mexico which is why he's seeking out the entertainment value in this thread.

That's ok, every body's got a right to their opinion and honestly; arguing about religion, guns or abortion is a complete waste of time because they are litmus test hot button issues that absolutely no one will ever change their mind on.

Guns, the more the better.
Religion, whatever blows your skirt up
Abortion, detestable but nobodies business. Everyone hates abortion till their 15 year old daughter gets knocked up. Unwanted equals future welfare recipient most the time any way I suspect. They ought to be paying unweds and women on welfare to have abortions, its an investment in the countries future. How's that for brutally pragmatic? (That was rhetorical
Jesting by the way)

 

[DMAN999]

All I can say is that if it's so wonderful and safe in Mexico, why are so many Mexicans illegally living in the US and why are they still alive ????
According to forestdaledave, the US is so dangerous all those illegals should have been shot by now.

 

[MtnMax/Magniac]

All I can say is that if it's so wonderful and safe in Mexico, why are so many Mexicans illegally living in the US and why are they still alive ????
According to forestdaledave, the US is so dangerous all those illegals should have been shot by now.

Is it too late? Did we miss our chance?

 

[85 MAX-fan]

Danny, we all know messing around with drugs can get a person killed. More ways than one. So I don't mess at all. Which brings a question asked of me from another poster. If I really believe what I said about being more relax in Mexico than in S.CA. The above is the difference. In Mexico the violence is focused. Stay away from illegal drug/trade and you stay away from violence. In CA. and the U.S. the violence is random.

Yet another socialist lie Dave. Data in the US proves that the majority of violence is drug related. FACT. A huge portion of that comes from the drug trade with roots in Mexico.

Anywhere, at any time and being armed doesn't seem to help at all.

Spoken like a true hoplophobe Dave! "Seems". Again have you read the Lott Study? Guns in the hands of law abiding people stop criminal attacks in huge numbers that are not reported by the socialists, and Dave. If he even knows this Dave ignores it because it would paint his hoplophobic rants as idiocy.

The other crazy concept that gun laws hasn't helped I have to remind about the law that came about from ST.Valentine Day's massacre. Kind of stopped fully automatic rifles. Breaking news right now.

Dave, the St Valantine's massacre was gang on gang drug violence. Not the random crazed killing you keep ranting about. This fact makes any point you were trying to make senseless. You are linking gang violence to random killing????? WTF????

At the same time you say 1934 act did help, but yet you say there is tremendous gun violence. Convenient that the statistics show long guns and automatic weapons are use in only a tiny fraction of actual killings. Then and now, more people are beaten,stabbed, and stangled. In Daves world if the socialist press doesn't report these killings, the innocent victims never existed. Dave does not spend one second trying to find a way to eliminate the killers in our society.


http://news.yahoo.com/mit-lockdown-reports-armed-gunman-145834790.html
This violence is too much. The person is using a long rifle, not a hammer or a knife or a paper clip. Once again I point to Chris Dornor from L.A. Being armed and trained didn't help the cops that he shot and killed.

So using your logic Dave, we should disarm the cops as well as the populas since it does them no good right?

But in the end he didn't win either. Unless of course putting his own gun to his own head is somehow winning against the Government.

Dave, you keep refusing to answer the question about why you are not upset by those who are stabbed, strangled, or beaten to death. Several have been killed in the same time frame as your example but you again are silent Dave. You are only terrified by killings where a gun is used, and yet claim Mexico is safer than the US, which destroys any credibility you may have had, and makes plain that you are devoid of logic.
Where were you born Dave? Europe perhaps? A former Soviet Block country? That would explain why you are unable to embrace liberty, and why you cannot function without government officials telling you exactly what to think, do, vote, and how to act. I am betting you were indoctrinated at an early age.

 

[85 MAX-fan]

Danny, we all know messing around with drugs can get a person killed. More ways than one. So I don't mess at all. Which brings a question asked of me from another poster. If I really believe what I said about being more relax in Mexico than in S.CA. The above is the difference. In Mexico the violence is focused. Stay away from illegal drug/trade and you stay away from violence. In CA. and the U.S. the violence is random. Anywhere, at any time and being armed doesn't seem to help at all. The other crazy concept that gun laws hasn't helped I have to remind about the law that came about from ST.Valentine Day's massacre. Kind of stopped fully automatic rifles. Breaking news right now.
http://news.yahoo.com/mit-lockdown-reports-armed-gunman-145834790.html
This violence is too much. The person is using a long rifle, not a hammer or a knife or a paper clip. Once again I point to Chris Dornor from L.A. Being armed and trained didn't help the cops that he shot and killed. But in the end he didn't win either. Unless of course putting his own gun to his own head is somehow winning against the Government.

Dave is so terrified about guns he will post links to false reports as his "EVIDENCE" for gun control.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/23/mit-campus-on-lockdown-after-report-gunman/

LOOKS LIKE THE SOCIALISTS WILL CREATE FEAR TO BUILD SUPPORT FOR DESTROYING THE SECOND AMMENDMENT. Dave would believe anything the television tells him to believe.

 

[forestdaledave]

Sure did Dave....stopped 'em cold!! Be really hard to find a full auto in the hands of an evil doer these days....yup! :icon_rolleyes:

Sorry Dave....the person doesn't exist. must be some liberal didn't think there was enough front page sensationalism already and decided to create some.....:confused2:I know it's fun going back 'n forth on this gun thing and all but ya gotta 'deal in the real' man! unk:

I'm missing your point Dave....they cancel each other out, or what? :ummm:

Yup, I jumped the gun on that MIT thing. Read it in the news. Won't happen again. I will wait until the bodies fall like cordwood in the future.

 

[85 MAX-fan]

Ouch, abortion is a separate issue from gun violence. You seem to want to keep confusing the two. The issue of guns and violence in society is complicated enough. Start another link about abortion if you want to rant about that. But you can start off with the knowledge that no one including me is in favor of abortion. Not even the women that elect to have it. That is an erroneous question. The same as when we were little kids and would ask our friends coyly if their mother knows their underware was dirty. Then get to laugh whatever the answer was. So start another thread about the abortion question. Maybe even expand to a political thread.

It is a separate issue in the logic of a socialist that mindlessly repeats the montra that inanimate objects kill, and not people.
Now even women that elect to kill their child are not to blame for their decisions. This is Dave's world.
Questioning Dave to try to get him to embrace personal responsibility will likely never work, because he believes people are stupid, incapable of decision making, and wholey dependent on the state to rule over them in every facet of their lives.

 

[85 MAX-fan]

Yup, I jumped the gun on that MIT thing. Read it in the news. Won't happen again. I will wait until the bodies fall like cordwood in the future.

How about the people beaten and stabbed Dave? What about those that are strangled?

 

[85 MAX-fan]

Yup, I jumped the gun on that MIT thing. Read it in the news. Won't happen again. I will wait until the bodies fall like cordwood in the future.

Fall like cordwood Dave? What is that supposed to mean? Wood piles just randomly are falling over across the US? Perhaps conservative teaparty members are conducting a secret telekinetic war on firewood and using the powers of their minds to knock over piles of firewood across the US.
:404:

Besides what does it matter if something is reported correctly in the news or not? Your decisions and opinions are not based on logic or fact to begin with, and you demonstrate that nearly every time you use a falsified statistic or source.

 

[Rusty McNeil]

Falling like cordwood is a very old phrase referring to massive human losses. Probably originated in the 1700's

Rooted more often in the phrase

"Bodies stacked like cordwood"

 

[Traumahawk]

I think 10 bodies per 100000 in Mexico is already falling like cord wood.

 

[dannymax]

My cordwood doesn't fall!! :biglaugh:

 

[Traumahawk]

My cordwood doesn't fall!! :biglaugh:

Wow....

 

[85 MAX-fan]

Falling like cordwood is a very old phrase referring to massive human losses. Probably originated in the 1700's

Rooted more often in the phrase

"Bodies stacked like cordwood"

I have heard "Bodies stacked like cordwood".

Never heard "falling like cordwood".



Either way if Dave feels that random, non drug related murders are going to have bodies "stacked like cordwood" constantly, I again ask why he has no concern for those killed with methods other than firearms?

 

[Redbone]

My cordwood doesn't fall!! :biglaugh:

Yup, Danny can stack him sum cordwood, that's for sure! Taller than the average man, cuz burning it down is the plan!
Like Danny told me once: "I may not always cut the wood, but when I do I stack like cordwood! Stay warm my friends!":biglaugh:

 

[dannymax]

I probly shouldn't have posted that picture as it clearly exhibits wanton disregard for the safety of trees and overwhelmingly violent activity towards them.

Hmmm, been hearing some recent whisperings regarding chainsaw registration....it seems I may be an offender!! :bang head::bang head::bang head:

 

[SpecOps13]

I probly shouldn't have posted that picture as it clearly exhibits wanton disregard for the safety of trees and overwhelmingly violent activity towards them.

Hmmm, been hearing some recent whisperings regarding chainsaw registration....it seems I may be an offender!! :bang head::bang head::bang head:

Baseball Bats are in jeopardy too....:rofl_200::ummm::confused2:

 

[85 MAX-fan]

I probly shouldn't have posted that picture as it clearly exhibits wanton disregard for the safety of trees and overwhelmingly violent activity towards them.

Hmmm, been hearing some recent whisperings regarding chainsaw registration....it seems I may be an offender!! :bang head::bang head::bang head:

You obviously don't care about global warming either Danny...