Likely absolutely no one...14.7 is indeed stoichiometric where the mixture of fuel and air is 'ideal' for a complete burn of both. 'Perfect' for a complete burn isn't 'perfect' for power and most naturally aspirated engines make the most power safely, and I stress safely as you can go leaner and get more power while risking things like detonation and burnt plug tips, etc., somewhere between 13 to 13.5-ish, give or take. Some will make more power at 12.8 while others might run better at 13.6, it all depends upon the engine and combustion chamber and piston shape, valve placement and valve/cam timing events, etc.Perfect fuel ratio is 14.7, but your diagram shows 13.8 and 13.4, which means 5-7% of gas doesn't burn, killing O2 sensors, catalytic converter and spark plugs.
I would like to hear story about somebody, who got adjusted ECM and then paid for cat replacement!
You're going by online numbers and not real world application. This is where we got the most power and torque for this particular setup. The gen 1's actually tend to make best overall power around 13:1 but under light loads (cruising) it's not uncommon to see 17 and even 18:1 for best economy. AND, as Mike noted. The Cat was removed a LONG time ago and was worth about 30-40lbs of dead weight and restriction.Perfect fuel ratio is 14.7, but your diagram shows 13.8 and 13.4, which means 5-7% of gas doesn't burn, killing O2 sensors, catalytic converter and spark plugs.
I would like to hear story about somebody, who got adjusted ECM and then paid for cat replacement!
Stock O2 is turned off in the flash...they're usually narrowband anyway and not real helpful for tuning.Is there downstream O2 sensor? It has to be tricked somehow.
He definitely uses Woolich software...you can see it in some of his videos. I also called him about a 'base' 'Busa tune and specifically asked if he used Woolich software and whether or not he 'locked' his tunes as I wanted to be able to use the data logger on the tune to adjust as needed. He loaded the 'base' tune using a screen share on my laptop and did some editing on the fueling to compensate for the altitude I'm at to get me close.Is he using Woolich programing to flash his ECU's ? Just saw that Woolich does offer it for the Vmax also...
Not terribly impressed? The stock bikes we've tested generally put down 168-172 and you have to make successive back to back runs to get the combustion chamber heated up. There was a short moment where it showed they pulled a few times between the base pull and first pull with the derestriction. They hid those runs when they talked about.
My bike has basically the same header but with different air filter setup (good for a few hp but not huge numbers) and a Gurued Gear reflash (we also offer that service through them). We made 202 rwhp and 130lbs of torque. This was with race fuel (added about 7hp) but that still means we have a LOT more power then the tune the other shop is showing.
Must have been in 4th gearI don't want to beat a dead horse here but just wondering has anybody had their Vmax dyno'd stock and have a HP curve like that were it falls off that bad ?? Mine didn't, it was at 170ish @ 9K. Regardless of the number I'm just concerned about how the curve fell off that bad...
Enter your email address to join: