It is unlikely that any mass produced engine will be able to cost effectively achieve machined mating surfaces that will not leak without a gasket. i.e. most mass produced engines.
That's one of the things a gasket is for. It remains expanded or is compressible between imperfectly mating surfaces to achieve a leak free seal.
When the sealing gasket is compressed all those little irregularities in the imperfectly mating surfaces can be cost effectively sealed with average skills and some hand tools. :clapping:
It makes sense to remove as much of the old, compressed gasket material from mating surfaces to allow the new gasket to do it's job properly.
BUT....
1) You do not have to have perfectly clean opposing surfaces, devoid of every trace of the previous gasket to allow the new one to do it's job of filling depressions and compressing between the high points. That's just anal compulsive behaviour and very few mechanics will do it. It's not functionally justified or cost effective.
2) Lankee is right. If you produce metal shavings you are gradually screwing up the surface tolerances of the mating surfaces.
3) Trying to produce a uniformly flat surface by the abrasive erosion of metal can not be manually achieved better than a CNC machined surface UNLESS you have an exactly flat surface (be it steel, stone, glass or whatever) to use a standard. This is much harder to achieve than most people think. That's why we use gaskets.
For the record I use a sharp flat blade and then stick the offending part in an ultrasonic cleaner. (that's anal) .
A dishwasher is a pretty good way to get the old gaskets off and clean your covers et at the same time (but don't tell my wife.)
That's one of the things a gasket is for. It remains expanded or is compressible between imperfectly mating surfaces to achieve a leak free seal.
When the sealing gasket is compressed all those little irregularities in the imperfectly mating surfaces can be cost effectively sealed with average skills and some hand tools. :clapping:
It makes sense to remove as much of the old, compressed gasket material from mating surfaces to allow the new gasket to do it's job properly.
BUT....
1) You do not have to have perfectly clean opposing surfaces, devoid of every trace of the previous gasket to allow the new one to do it's job of filling depressions and compressing between the high points. That's just anal compulsive behaviour and very few mechanics will do it. It's not functionally justified or cost effective.
2) Lankee is right. If you produce metal shavings you are gradually screwing up the surface tolerances of the mating surfaces.
3) Trying to produce a uniformly flat surface by the abrasive erosion of metal can not be manually achieved better than a CNC machined surface UNLESS you have an exactly flat surface (be it steel, stone, glass or whatever) to use a standard. This is much harder to achieve than most people think. That's why we use gaskets.
For the record I use a sharp flat blade and then stick the offending part in an ultrasonic cleaner. (that's anal) .
A dishwasher is a pretty good way to get the old gaskets off and clean your covers et at the same time (but don't tell my wife.)