2. Limited production only 2500 built 2009/ 2500 built 2010 limited production commands higher price.
I'm sorry I don't follow your logic here. Built another 2500 of the exact same bike but add $2k to the price tag? That red paint sure is pricey.. :rofl_200:
3.Technology packed performance .... aluminum frame, slipper clutch, abs, ride by wire,I don't need to go on..and with 1700cc v4 current stock state is very mild.. without mods this bike is a hell of a quick machine, with mods OMG..
Hey no-one disagrees with those facts, but it's still overpriced.
4. Nothing in it's class period.(and don't compare it to the Busa :damn angry: )
Yes it is in its own class - no complaints here either.
5.Price is what you are comfortable paying.. If you can't afford don't cry move on..Is this feature packed bike worth the current MSRP to me yepper
unk:
Well this is where we can agree to disagree. NO it's not worth
that MRSP.
6.Compare this to a BMW why??? It's not the same class.. compare it to a Triumph Rocket III Roadster and your comparing apples to apples and for 1k more in price with the V-Max, you have a better looking, better preforming,better built, with advance technology, And most important it will make the rocket look silly.
Compare to BMW simply because they have been similarly overpriced for a long time. And the the sub-$14k bike is about as technology-packed as the gen2 Max IMHO.
7. My only wish .. only 2500 current 09 were built as they are , then Yamaha listened to the criers and re-released the first gen with BNC (bold new colors).....hahahaah
Sure we can all dream. I saw a gen2 with 700 miles go for just about $14k on fleaBay a few weeks ago - now that's a lot more acceptable. Traditionally Japan has proven that they can make bikes of amazing quality at a very decent price, but I guess Star is trying to tap into the customer base that is used to overpay incredible amounts for 50s technology found in a certain brand of twins.. :biglaugh: