The second amendment to the constitution of the united states

VMAX  Forum

Help Support VMAX Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
One of the difficulties in that line of thinking is that a lot of these people are not criminals until after the fact of using a gun illegally.

Paperwork???? I don't follow you.
David

Dave....a lot 'of these people' have been criminals for a very long time before ever using a gun....just under the radar, that's all.

The budding little serial killer who, at 8 yrs old, tortures and kills neighborhood animals isn't a criminal just because he hasn't picked up a gun yet?

The Tsarnaev brothers were just a couple of fun lovin' bros from Beantown before getting some guns and pressure cookers?

Don't be so obtuse man....there's nothing wrong with profiling....it's actually correct most of the time! :punk:
 
It is really no big deal. It is just a method for coding. It is not some plan to drag down U.S. standards and won't affect U.S. standards. Not that ours are any better or higher than anywhere else in the world. The coding is for insurance companies. Every condition has a code. The international community wants that generic coding because of communication issues. The same thing has been done with vehicle codes for OBD 2.
David
One issue I have with that is who is doling out patients "conditions". In 2014 all dianosis' fall under the newly expanded ICD-10, an all encompassing healthcare playbook if you will, mostly controlled by government run healthcare(Obamacare). I know ICD- xx series is a medically driven tool so medical professionals can clearly define the illness' that are being cared for and so the Insurance companies can set their rates for reimbursement against those codes. Having the government as a single payor is destined to be a dysfunctional mess from the beginning. The government should only be in the oversight business and not actually trying to provide coverage.
I worked in the Home Health Care industry for 17 years in various capacities, just so you know I have a background in the insurance coding for reimbursement using ICD-9.
 
It is really no big deal. It is just a method for coding. It is not some plan to drag down U.S. standards and won't affect U.S. standards. Not that ours are any better or higher than anywhere else in the world. The coding is for insurance companies. Every condition has a code. The international community wants that generic coding because of communication issues. The same thing has been done with vehicle codes for OBD 2.
David

" No big deal " , " What does it really matter ? " etc. etc. etc. It's never a big deal what the liberals do to your individualistic rights when in power. It's only a big deal if a conservative standpoint is taken. Power / Control , it's all they want.
 
If there were a republican president in charge, and all of this going on...liberals and the media would be up in arms. Michael Moore made fahrenheit 9/11 in response to 9/11 and the patriot act. When it came to light that the telecommunications companies were giving information to the government to fight terrorists (exactly what is happening now) liberals were up in arms...Now...its not so much of a big deal.

The hypocrisy of it all is what pisses me off. I was against the patriot act as a whole because it would allow the government the ability to dig up any information on ANYONE without the benefits of having to obtain a search warrant as a safeguard. So...the fears that I had then...is what is happening now.
 
Dave....a lot 'of these people' have been criminals for a very long time before ever using a gun....just under the radar, that's all.

The budding little serial killer who, at 8 yrs old, tortures and kills neighborhood animals isn't a criminal just because he hasn't picked up a gun yet?

The Tsarnaev brothers were just a couple of fun lovin' bros from Beantown before getting some guns and pressure cookers?

Don't be so obtuse man....there's nothing wrong with profiling....it's actually correct most of the time! :punk:
Danny, I don't know how profiling could fit into determining if a person would be a criminal at some time in the future. It seems to me that it would be very straight forward type of thing. If a person has never been convicted of a felony then regardless of what they have done, look like, they are not a criminal. As I have read and you can too, by simply googling it, that it is a myth that criminals are the ones society needs to keep guns from. Mental health issues is a different issue.
 
Last edited:
Danny, I don't know how profiling could fit into determining if a person would be a criminal at some time in the future. It seems to me that it would be very straight forward type of thing. If a person has never been convicted of a felony then regardless of what they have done, look like, they are not a criminal. As I have read and you can too, by simply googling it, that it is a myth that criminals are the ones society needs to keep guns from. Mental health issues is a different issue.


Oh my!! :surprise::surprise::surprise:
 
One issue I have with that is who is doling out patients "conditions". In 2014 all dianosis' fall under the newly expanded ICD-10, an all encompassing healthcare playbook if you will, mostly controlled by government run healthcare(Obamacare). I know ICD- xx series is a medically driven tool so medical professionals can clearly define the illness' that are being cared for and so the Insurance companies can set their rates for reimbursement against those codes. Having the government as a single payor is destined to be a dysfunctional mess from the beginning. The government should only be in the oversight business and not actually trying to provide coverage.
I worked in the Home Health Care industry for 17 years in various capacities, just so you know I have a background in the insurance coding for reimbursement using ICD-9.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/16/b...bout-obamacare.html?partner=yahoofinance&_r=0
 
Dave.....there were some down points to that article...

IS there a catch? When I asked my Swedish hosts to describe any downsides to their system, several mentioned the waiting times for certain nonemergency services. One told me that whereas in the United States a wealthy or well-insured patient might schedule a hip replacement with only a week’s notice, in Sweden the wait could be as long as three months. He described such waits as a design feature, noting that they allowed facilities to be used at consistently high capacity, and thus more efficiently.

Obamacare also contains many evidence-based provisions for medication and other treatments. But at least in its initial stages, it will not be able to match the cost savings achieved in Sweden.

That’s because the legislation’s design was heavily constrained from the outset. Surveys showed that most Americans were satisfied with the existing health plans provided by their employers, so any new system that required people to abandon them would have been a political non-starter.
 
A country with less than 10 million people Dave? Most of our states are bigger than that! I'm no statistician but those numbers do not work when you apply it to a country of 315 million people.
Why don't you use a country like India or China for comparison since they are better suited to dealing with large populations such as United States when it comes to providing large scale healthcare.
In your reference that "that it is a myth that criminals are the ones society needs to keep guns from." can you clarify what you mean here? On face value I think Danny's and Traumahawk's responses seemed appropriate!:punk:
 
America cannot be compared to other countries we are unlike any of them period. Our founding fathers fought for and died believing in freedom for all who call themselves Americans. This is our Declaration
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

READ IT UNDERSTAND IT :punk:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top