The second amendment to the constitution of the united states

VMAX  Forum

Help Support VMAX Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

SpecOps13

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
6,027
Reaction score
36
Location
Tampa Bay
I needed an outlet for my views on this issue. Others have threads about the firearms issues but I seem to be out of place in them. Mainly seem to be overlooked in what I say there. Well now I have a thread. I have an extreme interest in all that's going on everywhere concerning the recent push by Liberals to get rid of any or all of our weapons.:bang head:

IT'S MY ENTIRE LIFE AND EXISTANCE AT RISK.

Here's my start.....................
Love this Judge............:worthy::clapping:


http://video.foxnews.com/v/2138468100001/
 
Last edited:
According to our liberal politicians, it's wrong to judge all Muslims by the actions of a few "crazies", but the actions of a few American "crazies" makes it OK to judge all American gun owners.
 
The agenda only begins with the gun grab, then in time we lose all freedom and become slaves, so they think.............got news for them.

O
 
Great video Dave!! I like her approach....no drama, hype or emotion....just factual irrefutable info delivered in a reasonable fashion.

We are being led down the path by a bunch of highly skilled manipulators, bogging us down with ******** like magazine size, weapons characteristics, etc. and we're so busy with that we completely overlook the obvious!

Just for example.....assault rifles! And Dave will attest to this....we're discussing all the 'evil' features like accessory rails, flash supressors, mag cap, folding/collapsable stocks, thumb holes, bayonets ....on & on, and we are completely distracted from the obvious.....THE WEAPONS THEY'RE REFERRING TO AS ASSAULT RIFLES (the ones they continually show on TV and all) AREN'T EVEN ASSAULT RIFLES AT ALL!!! Assault rifles are already banned....have been since 1986!

Watch the left hand folks, that's the one that's gonna get you!! You'll end up just like NY....rights stripping legislation already enacted and a long hard struggle to get a reversal....if it can be done at all....:confused2:
 
Great video. Pretty much says it all. I will personally never give up my guns. It's hard to even watch the news anymore without feeling like we're losing America or that it's already long gone. I don't know how much more of this libtard agenda I can stomach anymore. Another 4 ******* years and who knows after that ?
 
In the link she was talking about mental health issues, and that being one stopping point from allowing gun ownership legally.

In the latest DSM-5...the bible that is used to determine if you have a mental illness or not.....EVERYTHING is being classified as an illness.

http://www.naturalnews.com/038322_DSM-5_psychiatry_false_diagnosis.html

That is ONE way to keep guns out of the hands of the masses.
 
Like she says...paraphrasing of course , I'll go to jail before I give up my rights . PERIOD .
 
In the link she was talking about mental health issues, and that being one stopping point from allowing gun ownership legally.

In the latest DSM-5...the bible that is used to determine if you have a mental illness or not.....EVERYTHING is being classified as an illness.

http://www.naturalnews.com/038322_DSM-5_psychiatry_false_diagnosis.html

That is ONE way to keep guns out of the hands of the masses.

Its all about money with the DSM. More issues = more meds = more cash. If they were to propose legislation that would restrict access to firearms on the basis of if you fall anywhere in the DSM, we would all be screwed.

In the end I don't see local police departments or federal agencies going door to door collecting firearms. A lot of good people would lose their lives if such an event were to happen and it would like escalate into a civil uprising of some sort. I do not agree with the bureaucrats in power right now by any means, but even I don't think they are so simple minded to neglect to see what would be the result of imposing extreme measures.

In the end I am left with... :ummm: Just have to wait and see how it plays out.
 
Yet another quote by a socialist trying to indoctrinate the less informed into believing that they are incapable of defending themselves. Of course the Lott study destroys this stupidity and explains in detail how the leftists intentionally falsified the "study" they continue to quote to this day about people being at greater risk if they own a firearm. They are LIEING.
Apparently you are all capable of driving a 4000 lb car to work in so that you can pay the taxes necessary to fuel this socialism, but leftists need to find a way to convince you all that you are too stupid to master the skills needed to use a firearm, as our ancestors did 200 years ago.

Nice try...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/28/houston-homeowner-holds-3-burglary-suspects-at-gunpoint-until-police-arrive/?intcmp=obinsite
 
In the end I don't see local police departments or federal agencies going door to door collecting firearms. A lot of good people would lose their lives if such an event were to happen and it would like escalate into a civil uprising of some sort. I do not agree with the bureaucrats in power right now by any means, but even I don't think they are so simple minded to neglect to see what would be the result of imposing extreme measures.

In the end I am left with... :ummm: Just have to wait and see how it plays out.
History has plenty of examples of firearms confiscation even here in the US. Katrina, California, Chicago.......
People often don't want to believe there will be confiscation, and ultimately enslavement in their world. I hate to say it, but they are naive.
As far as bureacrats being simple minded or not, I feel it doesnt matter as they believe they have the power to rule over people as subjects.
 
The first link didn't work shortly after you posted it, then it started working later in the day when I checked it... Couldn't really tell you why, but that was my experience.
 
As the title to this thread says....this is about the 2nd Ammendment....not what guns are legal or what mag capacity is 'reasonable' or how many folks are killed by their own guns or any of the rest of that crap....it's about the RIGHT to bear arms guaranteed us by the Constitution and that right shall not be infringed upon.

Forget about all the studies and reports and other such ****, whoever created them will spin them to favor their viewpoint. It's not about numbers and protection and hunting, or muskets or obsolescence....it's about our Constitutional Rights.

And they are being infringed upon!!

It looks like this deal was pretty well kicked off by the guv of NY and perhaps it will be settled here as a NY State Supreme Court judge issued an injunction requiring said guv to prove the constitutionality of his recently rammed thru gun grabbing bill the NY UNsafe Act....and prove it by April 29th. 2013
 
Back
Top