Thevmaxrider
Well-Known Member
Not even from add's he takes in on his own?
Correct, no money whatsoever. His pay is set in the contract and he no longer gets any advertising income regardless of if he solicits it or not.
Not even from add's he takes in on his own?
Not even from add's he takes in on his own?
.
Now it seems like the VMOA is going to have a new President from another country, which only has 10% of the total membership. Not criticizing, just seems odd?
Please explain why you think this is odd? You seem to be confirming what a lot of Europeans and others believe in that the VMOA is the Vmax Owners of America attitude. I for one don't believe that to be the case, but when people read post such as yours they might. Funny thing is Bob I am a US citizen who has chosen to live in Canada therefore I am in a unique position to say I am really from both countries. The xenophobic attitude seems a bit over the top to me.
First off Dave , you have been a big pain in the ass for the VMOA Click" thatXenophobia is an irrational, deep-rooted fear of or antipathy towards foreigners.
Wow Jimmy such big words, I had to look that one up. It just shows that you know nothing about me, if you did you would not say I have a "xenophobic attitude".
Its more about the "majority" , of the VMOA live in the USA. and the "majority" should rule. But that's just not the way for this organization.
Now how about you answer the other question I posted:
"It seems I had some credibility when I posted:
Good by Kelvin
Good by Ronda
Good by Eddy"
Remember when you told me you know nothing about this?
Not totally truthful were you? You seem to have all the qualities to lead the VMOA.
I want to know who was responsible for putting cornell on the cover of the v-boost?
I thought he was on the cover because of his 8 second run on a Gen 2.
Half a GEN 2, with hidden N0S, not much of an accomplishment in my book.
The bike didn't even look like a GEN 2, just more BS.
4 DAYS LATER ................Bueller ?. ............... :rofl_200:
Has this ever been verified.....or is it conjecture? :confused2:
The truth.
Just like when I announced the top ********* from the VMOA were stepping down and I was questioned.
Bike was all jacked up on NOS had a lighter front end off some other bike and on and on , Just watch his vid you can see what's different and for those that race you can hear the shot of NOS comming out of the hole
The point is that people think a gen 2 went 8"s as a allmost stock bike, When it was far from stock . The fact that people are just plain dumb and will buy anything from UFO and think that their gen 2 will be a 8 second bike with just some bolt on parts is just wrong. I have put well over 6 grand in the motor of my Busa to get it to run low 9's every time 195 lb rider NO NOS all motor! with a lighter rider 130/140lbs with a good clutch hand it would run mid 8"s So Bolt on parts? RIGHTBob, I don't see where one has anything to do with the other, but setting that aside....why weren't the results of the run negated, or the bike DQ'd as an illegal set-up? Why....if it's such a major violation....is the run allowed to stand?
A lot of folks seem very upset about this....why hasn't the whole deal been run through the exposure cycle and hung out to dry on the line of public opinion?
I must be missing something? :ummm:
Enter your email address to join: