The Supreme Court got it right this time

[Traumahawk]

There is a flaw in his logic. Those states are gonna fight tooth & nail to nail him to the wall if he uses that reasoning if he gets stopped and busted for illegal carry. It will be one long, drawn-out battle to fight this all the way to the SCOTUS, And the states in question WILL fight him every step of the way, as well as possibly the judges below SCOTUS level.

Still, it is a battle that WILL be fought, and if it is him that fights it, I pray that he emerges victorious.

Somebody somewhere will fight this fight....and it will be interesting to see how it turns out, and I do find it amusing how the logic that SCOTUS used can be applied to other things as well.

 

[Biker Dash]

Somebody somewhere will fight this fight....and it will be interesting to see how it turns out, and I do find it amusing how the logic that SCOTUS used can be applied to other things as well.

The Constitution cannot be selectively applied to this and not that. It applies to EVERY state, EVERY person, and EVERY law in the United States.

 

[Traumahawk]

The Constitution cannot be selectively applied to this and not that. It applies to EVERY state, EVERY person, and EVERY law in the United States.

Did you read the article I posted in its entirety?

Sent from my SCH-R890 using Tapatalk

 

[Biker Dash]

Did you read the article I posted in its entirety?

Sent from my SCH-R890 using Tapatalk

Yeah... pretty much a drawn out version of what you posted.

 

[MtnMax/Magniac]

The Constitution cannot be selectively applied to this and not that.

Except when some liberal fringe group decides they've been mistreated because the rest of the world doesn't agree with them.

 

[Biker Dash]

Except when some religious bigoted zealots decide they've been mistreated because the rest of the world won't koe-toe to their beliefs.

Corrected it for you.

 

[Rollie]

The Constitution cannot be selectively applied to this and not that. It applies to EVERY state, EVERY person, and EVERY law in the United States.

Tell that to BO . He has directed his former attorney general puppet NOT to enforce certain laws and break some along the way.

 

[Biker Dash]

Tell that to BO . He has directed his former attorney general puppet NOT to enforce certain laws and break some along the way.

I am certain a million e-mails have been sent to him about that already, and I would be willing to place good money that everyone who sends such e-mails to him gets put on a watch list lol

Obama bin Laden has got to be one of the most blatant criminals to ever hold office in this nation!

 

[85 MAX-fan]

Really... gotta resort to name calling now?.

No, the sentence you quoted was a question. "Name calling" would not be in question form, it would be a statement, like "Dave is a coolaid drinker!". Sentence structure and punctuation.

Learn it
Know it
Live it
Perhaps it was the impact of reading the horribly offensive words "coolaid drinker" that threw you for a loop. I am sure Dave would agree that this whole freedom of speech concept should be outlawed just as enthusiastically as he has supported assaulting police officers.

 

[Biker Dash]

No, the sentence you quoted was a question. "Name calling" would not be in question form, it would be a statement, like "Dave is a coolaid drinker!". Sentence structure and punctuation.

Learn it
Know it
Live it
Perhaps it was the impact of reading the horribly offensive words "coolaid drinker" that threw you for a loop. I am sure Dave would agree that this whole freedom of speech concept should be outlawed just as enthusiastically as he has supported assaulting police officers.

Reading the post from earlier, just to confirm my thoughts, it feels more of an underhanded way of implying that he is a blind Jim Jones follower that happily plods along to his death at the hands of those he follows.

Direct name calling would not be in question form, but as a writer, I do happen to know how to recognize creative ways to say things to give an appearance of non-aggression.

I am sure Dave would agree that this whole freedom of speech concept should be outlawed

And you would be the first one pissing and moaning when it is your words that get silenced, I imagine.

Lastly, if I wanted to see anything "offensive", I would go to a Madonna concert.

 

[MtnMax/Magniac]

Corrected it for you.

You did NOT correct it, you changed it to suit yourself. Not the same thing at all.

 

[Biker Dash]

No need to get butthurt over it

 

[MtnMax/Magniac]

Not hurt at all, just semantically straightening out a misstatement. :biglaugh:

 

[johnpclynch]

 

[mvmccreary]

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA :clapping:

 

[Biker Dash]

 

[MtnMax/Magniac]

So, is this next?

http://news360.com/article/299826888#

 

[Biker Dash]

So, is this next?

http://news360.com/article/299826888#

Is that something that you are hoping for?

 

[MtnMax/Magniac]

Is that something that you are hoping for?

No, but I thought you might be . . .

 

[Biker Dash]

No, but I thought you might be . . .

So, because I have beliefs that differ from yours, it is assumed that I am someone who criminally seeks little boys and girls?

Please, explain your logic to me. I am quite interested in how you made this leap in judgement.