This is a spinoff of my other thread. I've been shopping pretty hard for a Gen2. I've found '10s listed for as little as $11K and I've seen several low-mile '14s go for around $12K on Ebay. It kind of seems like a no brainer--a '14 for $12K makes better sense than a '10 for $11K, since the '14 probably has a little warranty left and will depreciate more slowly than the '10.
But then there are dealers advertising new, 0-mile '14s for $14,999, and there's one dealer that sold a new '14 for under $14K. (He doesn't have any more in stock, and no guarantee of getting any more, but it shows that really aggressive pricing is possible.) Sure, tax, title and license would add $1000 to the cost of the new bike, making it $15-$16K out the door, but even a used '14 is going to have $600 or so of TTL, making it be at least $12.5K.
Of course this is subject to each person's buying power, but for someone who's a perpetual deal hunter (like myself), at what dollar amount does it make better sense to buy a new '14 over a used '14 or earlier bike? And if a '10 was $10K instead of $11K, how would that affect things?
But then there are dealers advertising new, 0-mile '14s for $14,999, and there's one dealer that sold a new '14 for under $14K. (He doesn't have any more in stock, and no guarantee of getting any more, but it shows that really aggressive pricing is possible.) Sure, tax, title and license would add $1000 to the cost of the new bike, making it $15-$16K out the door, but even a used '14 is going to have $600 or so of TTL, making it be at least $12.5K.
Of course this is subject to each person's buying power, but for someone who's a perpetual deal hunter (like myself), at what dollar amount does it make better sense to buy a new '14 over a used '14 or earlier bike? And if a '10 was $10K instead of $11K, how would that affect things?