Processes in the US may differ but
this is what happens in the UK.
Where there are no witnesses then I recognise that it may not possible to give a definitive answer to the cause of an accident.
I doubt that this is often the case so based on eye witness accounts and forensic evidence in most cases a reasonable conclusion can be reached.
Then why do you keep suggesting there is one?
How many is 'countless' and how do you quantify 'huge' and where have you obtained this information?
I have been on this site (and others) since 2007 and whilst the subject does occur from time to time countless and huge are not adjectives I would use to describe the issue.
I note you joined some 18 months ago so I'd be interested to know how many threads there have been on the subject since then.
What you appear to be saying is that you don't need to produce any facts to substantiate an allegation and therefore your hypothesis should be taken as true?
I'm glad our criminal justice system doesn't work on that basis or I may have been locked up years ago!
Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting that some bikes exhibit the characteristics
BUT there will be numerous causes for this and trying to fit them all into a single inherent issue with the bike is several leaps too far (MO).