+1VERY well researched, stated, and explained. Kudos....
+1VERY well researched, stated, and explained. Kudos....
I think it's probably true that if the IRS or any other alphabet soup agency digs into your financial or any other part of your former private lives then they will with certainty find something that can be amplified in a major "federal" crime. My dad, an honest and admirable man, WW2 Marine veteran told me from a young age to watch and be aware because if the cops want you for anything or any reason, you're screwed.I just noticed this RE tax records of Trump.
Looks like we might see whats in there after all. I'll laugh my *** of if it's all on the up and up, especially given how hard he made them work for it. I suspect that is not the case though.
https://rapidcityjournal.com/news/n...cle_7cb584b7-4690-5d0f-be01-5d4dcf2345f9.html
Sorry Lars, Guess I am not understanding your specific question. Maybe I have just missed it.As a foriegner I have made several questions of the situation in US..... still no answering on my normal outsider questions !
Why ? Afraid of reality ?
Perhaps People outside US is not worth discussing with ?
Just GDP level interesting.. !
//Lars
As a foriegner I have made several questions of the situation in US..... still no answering on my normal outsider questions !
Why ? Afraid of reality ?
Perhaps People outside US is not worth discussing with ?
Just GDP level interesting.. !
//Lars
More amusing and very good news. To bad they have so many spares of her ilk.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...rris-ends-2020-presidential-bid-idUSKBN1Y72B4
In regard to IRS I understand the disposition but it doesn’t make the lie ok. Check out on Netflix the confession tapes I think it’s called. It’s cases where people were coerced into confession. Definitely will not build any trust in our justice system.I think it's probably true that if the IRS or any other alphabet soup agency digs into your financial or any other part of your former private lives then they will with certainty find something that can be amplified in a major "federal" crime. My dad, an honest and admirable man, WW2 Marine veteran told me from a young age to watch and be aware because if the cops want you for anything or any reason, you're screwed.
Interesting read, Chris Wallace used to be the most centered journalist on Fox, he has been getting a little “Zaney” lately. My wife and I have discussed this a few times and I must agree with the jist of this article.
By Oleg Atbashian
First published in Front Page Magazine
PROG OFF
CrowdStrike: a Conspiracy Wrapped in a Conspiracy Inside a Conspiracy
In the last few days, media talking heads have been saying the word "CrowdStrike" a lot, defining it as a wild conspiracy theory originating in Moscow. They were joined by Chris Wallace at Fox News, who informed us that president Trump and his ill-informed fans believe in a crazy idea that the DNC wasn't hacked by the Russians but by some Ukrainian group named CrowdStrike that stole the DNC server and brought it to Ukraine , and that it was Ukraine that meddled in our 2016 election and not Russia.
A crazy idea indeed. Except that neither Trump nor his fans had ever heard of it until the Democrat-media complex condescendingly informed them that these are their beliefs.
Let's look at the facts:
Fact 1. In 2016 the DNC hired the Ukrainian-linked firm CrowdStrike to analyze their server and investigate a data breach.
Fact 2. CrowdStrike experts determined that the culprit was Russia.
Fact 3. The FBI never received access to the DNC server, so the Russian connection was never officially confirmed and continues to be an allegation coming from the DNC and its Ukrainian-linked contractor.
Fact 4. Absent the official verdict, other theories continue to circulate, including the possibility that the theft was an inside job by a DNC employee, who simply copied the files to a USB drive and sent it to WikiLeaks.
None of these facts was ever disputed by anyone. The media largely ignored them except for the part about the Russian hackers, which boosted their own, now debunked, wild conspiracy theory that Trump was a Russian agent.
Now that Trump had asked the newly elected Ukrainian president Zelensky to look into CrowdStrike during that fateful July phone call, the media all at once started telling us that "CrowdStrike" is a code word for a conspiracy theory so insane that only Trump could believe in it, which is just more proof of how insane he is.
But if Trump had really said what Mr. Wallace and the media claim, Ukrainians would be the first to call him on it and the impeachment would've been over by now. Instead, Ukrainians back Trump every step of the way.
So where did this pretzel-shaped fake news come from, and why is it being peddled now?
Note this is a classic case study of propaganda and media manipulation:
- Take an idea or a story that you wish to go away and make up an obviously bogus story with the same names and details as the real one.
- Start planting it simultaneously on media channels until the fake story supplants the real one, while claiming this is what your opponents really believe.
- Have various fact-checking outlets debunk your fake story as an absurd conspiracy theory. Ridicule those who allegedly believe in it. Better yet, have late night comedians do it for you.
- Once your opponent is brought down, mercilessly plant your boot on his face and never let up.
This mass manipulation technology had been tested and perfected by the Soviet propaganda machine, both domestically and overseas, where it was successfully deployed by the KGB. The Kremlin still uses it, although it can no longer afford it on the same grandiose scale. In this sense, the Democratic think tanks are the true successors of the KGB in deviousness, scope, and worldwide reach of fake narratives. How they inherited these methods from the KGB is a story for another day.
For a long time this technology was allowing the Democrats to delegitimize opposition by convincing large numbers of Americans that Republicans are…
- Haters
- Racists
- Fascists
- Deniers of science
- Destroyers of the environment
- Heartless sellouts to corporate interests
- And so on - the list is endless.
The Soviet communists had aptly named it "disinformation," which is a cut above the English word "misinformation." It includes a variety of methods for a variety of needs, from bringing down an opponent to revising history to creating a new historical reality altogether. In this sense, most Hollywood movies on historical subjects today disinform us about history, supplanting it with a bogus "progressive" narrative. The Soviet term for such art was "socialist realism."
Long story short, the Democrat-media complex has successfully convinced one half of the world that Trump is a Russian agent. Now they're acting as if they'd spent the last three years in a coma, unaware of any bombshell stories about collusion. And bombshell stories without any continuation are a telltale sign of fake narratives. The only consequence of these bombshells is mass amnesia among the foot soldiers.
The Trump-Russian outrage is dead, long live the Trump-Ukraine outrage. And when that outrage is dead, the next outrage that will be just outrageous.
The current impeachment narrative alleges that Trump used military aid as leverage in asking Ukraine to dig up dirt on Joe Biden (which implies the Democrats know Biden is dirty, otherwise why bother?). What's not in this picture is CrowdStrike. Even though Trump mentioned it in the phone call, it has nothing to do with the Bidens nor the Javelin missiles. CrowdStrike has nothing to do with impeachment. We're told it's just a silly conspiracy theory in Trump's head, that it's a nonissue.
But then why fabricate fake news about it and plant blatant lies simultaneously in all media outlets from Mother Jones to Fox News? Why risk being exposed over such a nonissue? Perhaps because it's more important than the story suggests.
Only a computer illiterate would think that CrowdStrike needed to take the physical DNC server to Ukraine in order to analyze it. Any computer can be cloned and its digital image can be sent anywhere on the planet in the form of ones and zeroes. It can also exist in multiple digital copies, carrying not just confidential archives, but also history logs and other content that can reveal to an expert whether the hacking occurred, and if so, by whom.
The copies of the DNC server on CrowdStrike computers are likely to hold the key to understanding what really happened during the 2016 election, the origin of the anti-Trump witch hunt, and the toxic cloud of lies that had been hanging over the world and poisoning minds during the last three years.
And now the new Ukrainian government might subpoena these copies from CrowdStrike and finally pass them to FBI experts, which should've been done three years ago. The danger of this happening is a much greater incentive for the Democrats to preemptively destroy Trump than all the dirt Joe Biden had been rolling in as Obama's vice president.
This gives the supposedly innocuous reference to CrowdStrike during Trump's call a lot more gravity and the previously incoherent part of the transcript begins to make sense.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say CrowdStrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation.
If you read the transcript on the day it was released, you probably didn't understand what Trump was even talking about, let alone what had caused such a disproportionate outrage, complete with whistle blowing and calls for impeachment. What in that mild conversation could possibly terrify the Democrats so much? They were terrified because, unlike most Americans, the Democrats knew exactly what Trump was talking about. And now you know, too.
The fraudulent "CrowdStrike conspiracy" deflection is not a show of the Democrats' strength. Instead, It betrays their desperation and panic, which tells us that Trump is squarely over the target.
It also helps us to see who at Fox News can be trusted to tell us the truth. And it ain't Chris Wallace
Until this country starts to return to it's Biblical roots and principals it will continue to go down this path. We are born into corruption and without being led away from that by God's word we are all led by our self serving greed as is displayed by the majority of the leadership in DC. This wonderful country was founded under the umbrella of the principal's found in the Bible, God's word. It's our history, our real history, not the history they are slicing and dicing and feeding young skulls of mush the last 50 or so years. I will continue to pray for our great country and all that reside in it, that those that haven't will repent and turn to the Lord Jesus Christ for repentance and His leadership and guidance through the Holy Spirit. May God Bless you all!
I think it's probably true that if the IRS or any other alphabet soup agency digs into your financial or any other part of your former private lives then they will with certainty find something that can be amplified in a major "federal" crime. My dad, an honest and admirable man, WW2 Marine veteran told me from a young age to watch and be aware because if the cops want you for anything or any reason, you're screwed.
. They want everything their way and only their way. Compromise is not in their vocabulary. Barring voter fraud by Democrats which we know is coming, Trump will win re-election in an Electoral College landslide. If Democratic voter fraud actually causes him to lose, there will be an armed rebellion in this country such as the world has ever seen. Wait and see.... Over 125 MILLION legal gun owners, with well over 600 MILLION registered weapons (not including unregistered), and over 14 TRILLION rounds of ammunition are just waiting....
Armed rebellion? Who would be the target? Anyone who disagrees with your theory? That is a brazen suggestion. One that i hope is false. Sounds like if that is how you feel then you are the uncompromising one.For over 3 years we have endured a non-stop onslaught against a duly elected President. The Mueller Report was supposed to be the 'Knockout Punch' against Trump and it was anything but. Most consider it a total flop. Now the Impeachment Hearings. I watched them closely and I saw/heard was conjecture based upon 2nd, 3rd, and 4th hand hearsay. I watched as Elise Stefanik made mincemeat out of Adam Schiff. Jim Jordan did the same but with all the Democrats and their witnesses. When finished, I realized I had watched nothing other than a Political Party try to unseat a duly elected President for no other reason than they hate him and the entire reason for this is because the Democrats KNOW there is no chance in the world they can beat Donald Trump in the next election so their only option is to remove him from office. THAT is how desperate the Democrats are to stay in power. For them, the good ship 'Ethics' has long since sailed. To me Democrats have become nothing more than the newest homegrown terrorist organization. They want everything their way and only their way. Compromise is not in their vocabulary. Barring voter fraud by Democrats which we know is coming, Trump will win re-election in an Electoral College landslide. If Democratic voter fraud actually causes him to lose, there will be an armed rebellion in this country such as the world has ever seen. Wait and see.... Over 125 MILLION legal gun owners, with well over 600 MILLION registered weapons (not including unregistered), and over 14 TRILLION rounds of ammunition are just waiting....
Nice post. That's a good way to get the FBI knocking at your door.
The Presidential election voter fraud fantasy that the President and other conspiracy theorist like yourself like to talk about has no basis in fact. Not one scintilla of substantiated evidence has ever come forward. (please don't post a link to some white nationalist website that claims proof)
Now there was some recent fraud perpetrated by a Republican in North Carolina this year that was proven, but even that was a matter of very few votes....albeit in a close election.
Armed rebellion? Who would be the target? Anyone who disagrees with your theory? That is a brazen suggestion. One that i hope is false. Sounds like if that is how you feel then you are the uncompromising one.
Enter your email address to join: