V-Max Speed Wobble (ran it up to 115mph and...)

VMAX  Forum

Help Support VMAX Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I did this, put progressive springs in.. Mostly because I dropped my front end an inch and the front fender was rubbing when I braked. It changed my speed wobble a little bit in terms of what speed range it occurred. I did the "drop test" where you lift the front wheel and allow it to drop when you turn it. I ended up tightening the the steering bearing nut and it solved the speed wobble up to 120 (there's only so fast you can go down my street at 10 pm.) Then I had it in the shop getting it rejetted due to an exhaust change and they said my bearing and race were worn out. Now my slow speed wobble is back. I will try tightening the head nut again since it's new. Mine is a 2007.
Yuck!

Looking at things in a positive light..... all of these things I've looked at, mostly one at a time, has let me observe and feel what (if any) difference each change makes on the system. Additionally, it has caused me to find and resolve various (including safety) issues. So this has been great. Now I know the steering bearings are good. The swingarm bearings are good. The wheel bearings are good. The brakes are rebuilt and safe. The rotors are true. The tires are new. Rear shocks are new and working. I am still working on the front end because I've touched about everything and haven't solved the issue to my satisfaction yet. But now I don't have to speculate on parts of the system that are already corrected.

Most alarming so far was how much lateral slop I found in the swingarm. I mean, it must have been 2-4mm(!) and now, with new bearings and torqued to spec, there is 0 slop. That's just one of the bigger issues I found. But that did not remove the wobble!

So... my theory I'm working on at the moment is that the issue is 100% with the front end and probably specifically with the forks. I've read other people's descriptions of the "wobble" and the best way to think of it is when you are at 65 or faster and you jiggle the handlebars a little (small inputs!), the bars won't quickly stabilize; instead, it takes 6-8 or more oscillations back and forth to stabilize or "settle down." On other modern bikes, the front end settles way sooner, maybe 2-4 oscillations, or none at all. So on the max, when the front end feels this wiggly, you'll notice at 75 or better, changing lanes, bumps in the road, wind buffeting, etc., will cause the bike to start weaving or wiggling gently, which is a warning to slow down, unload the front end, and go resolve the issues.

The Shinko 230 tires feel noticeably more responsive than the ME880s that were on it so the effect of going to the 230s was actually an increase in the onset of the wobble. The front end became more responsive and I believe the 230s just aggravated the underlying other issues. This will be a disappointment to anyone who thinks just a tire change will fix a wobble, when the issue is elsewhere.

What I did notice is with no spring preload and 5w oil, with the bike on the center stand and a little weight on the front wheel, wiggling the handlebars seems to really reveal the front end slop. In a way, this feels exactly like it does at speed. So this test served to help me theorize that the front end is entirely where the issue is at the moment, and specifically in the forks. So the next step was to add preload back and try to reset sag and this was noticeably better up to highway speed, especially regarding how quickly the oscillations would settle out. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to try a higher speed test yet but may tonight.

I can definitely say that the front forks absolutely should be properly configured for the specific rider, AND that the steering head bearings must be in good shape and at proper torque. So far, these 2 items seem to be contributing, at least in my case, more to the wobble than anything else, and since the bearings are good, now, that leaves the forks....

Oil level must be the same on both sides. Spring rates must be the same on both sides. Both forks must move the same on both sides, and neither should have more stiction than the other. The correct amount of preload and static sag must be set for the rider. The oil weight must be set for the rider and for the forks to move freely.

Many of us just want the front end to stop diving during braking, so we go to heavier oil, progressive springs, etc. I think this can be fine IF there are no other issues, such as especially the steering head bearings. But if you take more play out of the forks, it may transfer more stress and movement to other areas of the bike, such as the steering head bearings, frame, etc.

The spring and the damping have to work together to keep lateral stability. In the 85 model, the only option for tuning the damping is to experiment with oil! Yamaha changed the quantity of oil holes as well as the oil hole diameters in various ways across the years as a way to fine tune the forks. Also, I don't think this 40 year-old design is super sensitive, either. I feel like you really have to get into the bumps and get the forks moving a LOT to notice the damping. In contrast, I notice damping action with the economy Progressive 412 shocks with as little as a half-inch of spring compression. I imagine more expensive suspension is even more sensitive.

So the consequence of screwing up the fork settings on (at least) the 85 forks is that they are configured way too stiff (causes improper sag/no sag/too tall in relation to back suspension, harsh ride, springs are preloaded too much so damping is ineffective, etc.) or they are configured way too soft (too much sag, bike leans forward in relation to back suspension, no spring preload causes too much reliance on damping/oil and spring rates for lateral stability, etc.). Setting proper sag on front and rear should place the forks and shocks a little into their travel, which will preload the springs just enough and also activate the oil and damping.

In other words, damping and spring rates have to work together on the old forks. Damping, by itself, sucks on the 85 forks, in my opinion, and OEM springs by themselves, without damping, suck on the 85 forks, in my opinion. I think the trick, after making sure every other part of the system is in good, properly-configured order, at least on the 85, is to get a little bit of spring action and a little bit of damping action set properly with static sag, ride test, and go from that point. And there may not be additional improvements after that without moving away from OEM altogether and drilling out the damper rods and then installing valves or cartridge emulators or other modern tech.

If one OEM spring in one side is a little more tired than another, then this could definitely contribute to instability and oscillation. If one fork has more or less oil than the other side, or viscosity isn't the same in both sides, or if one damper rod is halfway obstructed, or if one fork has less air pressure than the other side or even bushing wear isn't the same, I could see how all could contribute to the problem.

So I am really refocusing only on the front end again and a logical choice is to ditch the springs I have now and go with new springs and start over with a known spring rate, lighter oil weight (5 vs 10), proper oil level, and finally, a preload/sag of at least 1" or more. Also, it is worth a double-check of the damper rods to make sure they are both identical and not mixed from different years, so I'll do that tonight as well.
 
Last edited:
You mentioned the air being the same in both sides, you have a '92 so there should be one schrader valve servicing both sides. Unless you have some material plugging the pneumatic line on one side or the other, that is.

I forget what you said you are for size/weight, but I think 5 wt is too-little for most riders, unless you're something like 120 lbs ready-to-ride. Race-Tech, YSS, and RICOR all have wave-washer stacks to remove damping from the damper rods. I have a RICOR set and upgraded to the 1993+ 43 mm forks & brakes in my '92.
 
So the 5w-20 synthetic and 5.5" spacers puts the sag in a good place and the forks are doing the job now. This made a noticeable improvement and by simple testing means, seems to have raised the wobble onset speed by 10-15mph alone.

Too windy to reliably test but it feels much better at freeway speed.

I notice with throttle roll ons and throttle chops that the forks move probably too much of course but they are active.

What I think is happening now on higher speed runs is that the forks are lengthening/extending to the top of their travel. On the freeway, I believe this mostly removes the sag and thus most if not all of the damping. The springs are mostly then handling the bumps and that's what I believe I'm feeling: higher speeds extend the fork and riding sag!

I think if I can tune up the forks properly, I may be finally in business.

Your idea of 7.5w oil may be about right as well. At least I'm trending in the right direction!
 
I don't know if this is typical of the 85 front fender mount.... the bolts line up but they sure leave a lot of slop between the fork mounts and the brace on both sides...
 

Attachments

  • 20240701_193922.jpg
    20240701_193922.jpg
    1.9 MB
I can't find any obvious issues upon visual inspection. I was hoping to find mismatched damper rods but these have 4 holes each. Springs appear to be the same.

One of the bushings isn't quite flat near the joint, along with fork brace / fender mount slop on both sides. That's all I can find regarding the forks. The 4 bolts hold everything well but I can see how a fork brace could fill the gap better.
 

Attachments

  • 20240701_204617.jpg
    20240701_204617.jpg
    777.1 KB
  • 20240701_204849.jpg
    20240701_204849.jpg
    1.9 MB
I can't find any obvious issues upon visual inspection. I was hoping to find mismatched damper rods but these have 4 holes each. Springs appear to be the same.

One of the bushings isn't quite flat near the joint, along with fork brace / fender mount slop on both sides. That's all I can find regarding the forks. The 4 bolts hold everything well but I can see how a fork brace could fill the gap better.
I put new progressives on front and back and it didn't make much of a difference at all. I still get wobble too and I just except it as a flaw in the suspension design on stock gen1 vmax's. I especially hate how it handles the little wavy ridge lines in the road. I still love my MAX though more than any of my other bikes. If you work something out and get it straightened out without literally changing the whole front end and wheels I would love to know about it.
 
Thanks guys.

It is expensive and time consuming but I don't want to admit defeat.

I'm almost out of tactics for the 85 / 40mm front end. Going to replace the wheel, axle, and speedometer clutch next and reassemble. Probably a fork brace too.

If nada, I'll fit an ME880 front tire.

If nada, possibly a front end swap...
 
Referencing these other posts, as they offer more ideas to try:
I can verify that the Shinko tires absolutely made the bike feel more responsive and did NOT lessen the front end wobble. I can't say that they caused the issue on my bike, since ME880s were on it before, but I think the Shinkos have contributed.

Waiting for more front end parts to arrive and if all of that is a bust, I will have to decide if I want to try ditching the Shinko 230s for something else.

The difficulty is that we have a system of parts and if it only takes fractions of a mm or a mm or 2 here and there added up to cause the wobble, only one part should be changed at a time and all have to be to spec. Added difficulty is that it can be hard to feel during ride testing the difference of a fraction of a mm.
 
Mine wobbles at 85mph+. I find if I hold the handle bars very rigidly it stops. I've fitted frame braces, changed the fork springs, balanced the front wheel, tightened the steering bearings but still a wobble. Tightening the steering bearings and also adjusting the rear suspension settings helps to reduce the problem. When I go over bumps the whole bike can go into a wobble. If I put it on the centre stand to lift the back wheel off the ground and rev it to 90mph there is no wobble. I have yet to change the Avon tyres. Changing the rear suspension may be an option. What if 1 rear suspension unit was weaker than the other?
unnamed.jpg
 
PS. It doesn't wobble when the wife is sat on the back and also if I push my bum well to the back of the seat it helps.
 
I find if I hold the handle bars very rigidly it stops. [....] It doesn't wobble when the wife is sat on the back and also if I push my bum well to the back of the seat it helps.

Brian.... I have found exactly the same things! Way back in the beginning of this thread, I discuss pushing forward strongly on the bars to stop the weave.

Post #22 of this thread describes a test I have done before many times, which involves giving a heel bump to one of the handlebar grips at safe speeds and noting how many oscillations occur before the input settles out. Can you safely do a test and report back? I have done this test myself and thought I may be the only one to try it but in my case, depending on speed, I may see 4-8 oscillations before the front settles down. I believe this is a huge clue about the problem. It's way worse at higher speeds; I perform it with 2 hands at higher (60+) speeds for this reason.

I can also reach the front fork seals and also rear shocks while riding, and if I place my hand on either while weaving or making some careful steering inputs, I can get some idea of what the suspension is doing at this time. Surprisingly, there is very little front and rear fork compression going on. Yet the bike feels sloppy in steering anyway.

At speed, all of the slop, to me, feels like it is coming from the front end, but I have yet to prove that to be true or false.

It's too bad we couldn't get together with a few bikes and just swap a front end from one to the other and back to see if the problem follows....
 
PS. It doesn't wobble when the wife is sat on the back and also if I push my bum well to the back of the seat it helps.
Brian.... what if you measure the front and rear suspension sag with just you and then with your wife?

2 theories: the extra weight settles it all down, or the steering geometry becomes more stable with the extra suspension sag....

If just a geometry change were to settle it down, one could easily change that for a single rider...
 
It may be that the frame has a natural resonant frequency and by shifting the weight or adding extra weight dampens the effect. I will experiment with the bike in a different gear in case the engine rpm is effecting it. My model was made about 1998.
 
Could what your feeling be the engine walking in the frame? Original motor mounts ?
Just a thought
 
Could what your feeling be the engine walking in the frame? Original motor mounts ?
Just a thought
Maybe!

On that thought, I looked up pics of the frame on eBay and realized that the right side has a section that is bolted on together. That's another item I plan to check also... the frame bolts.
 
Maybe!

On that thought, I looked up pics of the frame on eBay and realized that the right side has a section that is bolted on together. That's another item I plan to check also... the frame bolts.
That is designed for removing the engine. The bolts should be very tight and loc tited in place.
 
Back
Top